deriv SD cv (467) ashtadhyayi.com hei.de L 467 ETT STT a 1.1.5 ALPH OLDHOMEPAGE NEWHOMEPAGE
Nor before a /kGit.
Addition to < nadhAtulop.... Do no replace with /guNa and /vRddhi before a /kGit affix.
This rule applies to affixes that would ordinarily cause /guNa or /vRddhi.
Example. Verbs affixes usually cause /guNa by rules hardsoft and pugantalagh... —
nI नी + /zap → ne ने + /zap → **naya- नयॱ by hardsoft
dviS द्विष् + /tip → dveS द्वेष् + /tip → **dveSTi द्वेष्टि by pugantalagh...
However, verb affix /kta has k क् label, so this rule debars hardsoft —
nI नी + /kta → **nIta- नीतॱ
and pugantalagh... —
dviS द्विष् + /kta → **dviSTa- द्विष्टॱ
and all other rules that replace with /guNa or /vRddhi.
Now an example with /tas, that has G ङ् label —
dviS द्विष् + /tas → **dviSTas द्विष्टस् "they2 hated"
How come /tas has G ङ् label? You didn't sing Gtas ङ्तस् nor tasG तस्ङ्.
It has G ङ् because rule sArvadhAtuk... says it does.
Affix /Gas has G ङ् label, does that prevent /guNa or /vRddhi somehow?
No; this rule only applies to affixes that would cause /guNa or /vRddhi if they did not have the G ङ् or k क्. which is the same thing as saying, it applies to verb affixes only.
Why does my book spell this sUtra as gkGitica ग्क्ङितिच?
That's a long and boring story. Just NVM the spelling and chant this sUtra as kGitica क्ङितिच.
na dhAtu-lopa:: Ardh... < | 11005 k;Giti ca | > dIdhIvevITAm |
kid AziSi <<< | L 467 | >>> luG |