deriv LSK ETT STT aSTA ALPH OLDHOMEPAGE NEWHOMEPAGE
Can't **guru- गुरुॱ and **RSi- ऋषिॱ be f ?
They can. Grammar allows that. Yet, usage and custom prefer to add some feminine affix —
**guru- गुरुॱ f → **gurvI- गुर्वीॱ "teacheress"
**RSi- ऋषिॱ f → !**RSikA- ऋषिकाॱ "prophetess"
What about adjectives that end in i इ u उ?
When these are f , they can get feminine affixes —
**guru- गुरुॱ f + /jas
→ **guru- गुरुॱ f + /GI + /jas
→ !**gurvyas गुर्व्यस् f "heavy ones" as in gurvyaz zilAH गुर्व्यः शिलाः
**bahu- बहुॱ f + /jas
→ !**bahvyas बह्व्यस् f "many" as in as in bahvyaz zilAH बह्व्यः शिलाः
or work like the masculine —
**guru- गुरुॱ f + /jas → **guravas गुरवस् as in guravaz zilAH गुरवः शिलाः "heavy stones"
**bahu- बहुॱ f + /jas → !**bahavas बहवस् as in bahavaz zilAH बहवः शिलाः "many stones"