deriv LSK ETT STT aSTA ALPH OLDHOMEPAGE NEWHOMEPAGE
Even though somewhere else I wrote things like this —
kR कृ + /liT → **cakR- चकृॱ + /liT
kR कृ + /liT /tip → **cakR- चकृॱ + /tip → **cakR- चकृॱ + /Nal → **cakAra चकार
kR कृ + /liT /jhi → **cakR- चकृॱ + /jhi → **cakR- चकृॱ + /us → **cakrus चक्रुस्
these turn out to be a sloppy way of explaining how things work, because in fact the reduplication of the root by liTidhAtor... only happens AFTER the /liT tense has been replaced, like this —
kR कृ + /liT
→ kR कृ + /tip
→ kR कृ + /Nal
→ kAr कार् + /Nal by !!
→ kA का + kAr कार् + /Nal by liTidhAtor...
→ ka क + kAr कार् + /Nal
→ ca च + kAr कार् + /Nal
→ **cakAra चकार
yaj यज् + /liT /tip
→ yaj यज् + /Nal
→ yAj याज् + /Nal by ata::upadh...
→ yA या + yAj याज् + /Nal by liTidhAtor...
→ i इ + yAj याज् + /Nal with /samprasAraNa of the /abhyAsa by liTyabhyAsasy...
→ **iyAja इयाज "he sacrificed"
yaj यज् + /liT /jhi
→ yaj यज् + /us
→ ij इज् + /us with /samprasAraNa by vacisvapiy..., because /us is /kit by asaMyogAll...
→ i इ + ij इज् + us उस् by liTidhAtor...
→ Ij ईज् + us उस् by akassavarN..., unaffected by abhyAsasyAs... because of savarNahood
→ !**Ijus ईजुस् "they sacrificed"