deriv LSK ETT STT aSTA ALPH OLDHOMEPAGE NEWHOMEPAGE

@summary of replacements of jha

/laT /jha makes /anta''' or /ata''' by jhontaH or Atmanepad....

**arundhata अरुन्धत "they obstructed"

There is n न् only after a अ bases —

**alabhanta अलभन्त "they got"

Of course the /Tit tenses get Tita::Atman... —

**labhante लभन्ते (again there is n न् only after a अ).

**rundhate रुन्धते

**dviSate द्विषते

dA दा + /laT /jha → **dadA- ददाॱ + /ate''' → dad- दद् + /ate''' → !**dadate ददते

but the /loT /jha replaces that e ए with Am आम्, by AmetaH —

**labhantAm लभन्ताम् (again there is n न् only after a अ).

**runadh- रुनध् + /loT /jha → !**rundhatAm रुन्धताम्

**dviSatAm द्विषताम्

dA दा + /loT /jha → !**dadatAm ददताम्