deriv SD cv (214) ashtadhyayi.com hei.de L 214 ETT STT a 6.1.105 ALPH OLDHOMEPAGE NEWHOMEPAGE

dIrghAj jasi ca

दीर्घाज्जसि च ONPANINI 61105

(Rule <<< prathamayoHp... won't work) after a long before /au /jas.

<<< prathamayoHp... was an exception to <18 AdguNaH, <<<< akassavarN..., and ikoyaNaci.

Thsi rule deactivates that exception.

Therefore, in the exception to the exception, those rules reappear, and we get by <18 AdguNaH —

azvA- अश्वाॱ f + /au
→ azvA- अश्वाॱ + /zI
→ **azve' अश्वेऽ "two mares"

and by <<<< akassavarN... —

khaTvA- खट्वाॱ f + /jas → !**khaTvAs खट्वास् " s beds" by <<<< akassavarN..., sounds same as **khaTvAs' खट्वास्ऽ o

azvA- अश्वाॱ f + /jas → !**azvAs'' अश्वास्ऽऽ " s mares" by <<<< akassavarN..., , sounds same as **azvAs' अश्वास्ऽ o

and by ikoyaNaci —

**nadI- नदीॱ + /jas → !**nadyas नद्यस् "rivers"

**nadI- नदीॱ + /au → !**nadyau नद्यौ

**vadhU- वधूॱ + /au → !**vadhvau वध्वौ "two wives"

**vadhU- वधूॱ f + /jas → !**vadhvas वध्वस् "wives"

Why do we say "/jas"?

Rule <<< prathamayoHp... works as usual before /zas —

khaTvA- खट्वाॱ f + /zas → !**khaTvAs' खट्वास्ऽ " o beds" by <<< prathamayoHp..., sounds same as **khaTvAs खट्वास् s

azvA- अश्वाॱ f + /zas → !**azvAs' अश्वास्ऽ " o mares", sounds same as **azvAs'' अश्वास्ऽऽ s

nadI- नदीॱ f + /zas → !**nadIs नदीस् " o rivers"

vRkI- वृकीॱ f + /zas → **vRkIs वृकीस्

**kukkuTI- कुक्कुटीॱ f + /zas → !**kukkuTIs कुक्कुटीस् " o hens"

vadhU- वधूॱ f + /zas → **vadhUs' वधूस्ऽ " o wives"

That **vadhUs' वधूस्ऽ " o wives" sounds the same as **vadhUs वधूस् " s wife".