deriv SD cv (507) ashtadhyayi.com hei.de L 507 ETT STT a 3.1.40 ALPH OLDHOMEPAGE NEWHOMEPAGE

kRJ cAnuprayujyate liTi

कृञ्चानुप्रयुज्यते लिटि ONPANINI 31040

(After what ends in /Am'',) add an auxiliary before /liT.

In more words — when root IkS ईक्ष्, because of <<<< ijAdezcag..., gets /Am'', before /liT, then AmaH erases that /liT, and then this rule adds after it, as if it were an affix, a verb (kRJ कृञ् + /liT) or (bhU भू + /liT) or (/as + /liT) built with the same /liT affix that was deleted by AmaH.

IkS ईक्ष् + /liT /ta
→ IkS ईक्ष् + /Am'' + /liT by <<<< ijAdezcag...
→ IkS ईक्ष् + Am आम् + /luk by AmaH
→ IkS ईक्ष् + Am आम् + (kR कृ + /liT /ta) by this rule
→ IkS ईक्ष् + Am आम् + **cakre चक्रे
→ !**IkSAJcakre ईक्षाञ्चक्रे "saw"

In the case of the derivative root **pAci पाचि, the /Am'' comes from <<<<< kAspratyayAd... —

!**pAcayAJcakAra पाचयाञ्चकार "made him cook"

!**pAcayAmbabhUva पाचयाम्बभूव

!**pAcayAmAsa पाचयामास

Notice that in **pAcayAmAsa पाचयामास, the /as does not become bhU भू by asterbhUH here, even though the /liT affixes are soft by liTca.

How do we know that this /as that follows /Am'' is an exception to asterbhUH?

If it were not an exception,