deriv SD cv (455) ashtadhyayi.com hei.de L 455 ETT STT a 3.4.99 ALPH OLDHOMEPAGE NEWHOMEPAGE

nityaG GitaH नित्यं ङितः ONPANINI 34099

(Replace /mas /vas) of a Git tense (with /lopa).

So —

pac- पच् + /laG /mas
→ **apaca- अपचॱ + /mas
→ apaca अपच + /ma''' by this rule
→ apacA अपचा + /ma''' by atodIrghoyaJi
→ !**apacAma अपचाम "we cooked"

pac- पच् + /laG /vas → !**apacAva अपचाव "we two cooked", same steps as **apacAma अपचाम

The /loT is not a Git tense naturally, but <14 loTolaGvat makes it into an honorific /Git —

pac- पच् + /loT /mas
→ **paca- पचॱ + /mas
→ paca पच + /ma''' by <14 loTolaGvat and this rule
→ pacA पचा + /ma''' by atodIrghoyaJi
→ !**pacAma पचाम "let's cook"

**naya- नयॱ + /loT /mas → **nayAma नयाम "let's lead"

**naya- नयॱ + /loT /vas → !**nayAva नयाव "let's2 lead"

These /va''' /ma''' are secondary endings.

Why does the original sUtra contain the word nityam नित्यम् "compulsorily"? You did not translate it.

If the nityam नित्यम् where not here, this sUtra would have inherited the optionality of < sa::uttamasya, which would suck.