deriv SD cv (458) ashtadhyayi.com hei.de L 458 ETT STT a 3.4.100 ALPH OLDHOMEPAGE NEWHOMEPAGE

itaz ca इतश्च ONPANINI 34100

patissamAs... hole

(/tip /sip /jhi) lose their i इ (when they replace Git tenses).

Examples with /tip —

pac पच् + /laG /tip → **apaca- अपचॱ + /t''' → **apacat अपचत् "he cooked"

pac पच् + /luG /tip → apac अपच् + /sic + /t''' → !**apAkSIt अपाक्षीत् "he just cooked", mostly like **adrAkSIt अद्राक्षीत्

pac पच् + hard liG /tip → **paca- पचॱ + **yAt यात् → !**pacet पचेत् "he's cook"

**abhava- अभवॱ + /laG /tip
→ abhava- अभवॱ + /t''' by this rule
→ !**abhavat अभवत् "he was"

Examples with /sip —

**abhava- अभवॱ + /laG /sip
→ abhava- अभवॱ + /s''' by this rule
→ !**abhavas अभवस् "you' were"

dviS द्विष् + /laG /sip → adveS अद्वेष् + /s''' → adveS अद्वेष् by halGyAbbhyodIrgh... → **adveT अद्वेट्

Examples with /jhi —

**abhava- अभवॱ + /laG /jhi
→ abhava- अभवॱ + /jh''' by this rule
→ abhava- अभवॱ + /ant''' by jhontaH
→ abhavant अभवन्त् by atoguNe
→ abhavan अभवन् by saMyogAntasy...
→ !**abhavan अभवन् "they were"

**adviSan अद्विषन् "they hated"

/aT + **rundh- रुन्ध् + /ant''' → !**arundhan अरुन्धन् "they obstructed"

**akuru- अकुरुॱ + /ant''' → !**akurvan अकुर्वन् "they did"

Sometimes this won't work on /jhi because sijabhyastav... 9> works earlier and replaces /jhi with /jus —

pac पच् + /luG /jhi → apac अपच् + /sic + /jus → !**apAkSus अपाक्षुस् "they just cooked"

The original sUtra says "erase i इ", so shouldn't this sUtra affect /mip?

Nope; tasthasthamip... > makes /mip into /am''' before this can work.

And shouldn't /iT', /vahi and /mahi lose their i इ too?

No; we inherit the word "flat" from the vedic sUtra <<< itazcalop....

pac पच् + /laG /mahi → !**apacAmahi अपचामहि