@sa-aorists some

diz दिश् before /luG
→ adiz अदिश् by luGlaGlRGkSvaD...
→ adiz अदिश् + /cli by cliluGi
→ adiz अदिश् + sa स by zala::igup...
→ adiS अदिष् + sa स by vrazcabhrasjas...
→ adik अदिक् + sa स by SaDhoHkassi
→ adik अदिक् + Sa ष with /Satvam
→ !**adikSa- अदिक्षॱ

dviS द्विष् + /luG
→ adviS अद्विष् + /cli by cliluGi
→ adviS अद्विष् + sa स by zala::igup...
→ advik अद्विक् + sa स by SaDhoHkassi
→ advik अद्विक् + Sa ष with /Satvam
→ !**advikSa- अद्विक्षॱ

diz दिश् + /luG /jha
→ **adikSa- अदिक्षॱ + /jha
→ **adikSa- अदिक्षॱ + /anta'''
→ !**adikSanta अदिक्षन्त

diz दिश् + /luG /jhi
→ !**adikSan अदिक्षन्

Because of ksasyAci, the three endings /AthAm /AtAm /iT' erase the a अ of the /ksa (see zala::igup...).

**adikSAthAm अदिक्षाथाम् "you'' pointed (bent)"

**adikSAtAm अदिक्षाताम् "they2 pointed (bent)"

**adikSi अदिक्षि "I pointed (bent)"

Uh? wouldn't akassa अकःस make adikSa + AthAm into adikSAthAm अदिक्षाथाम्?

No. As the a अ is not erased, AtoGitaH turns A आ of the /luG into iy इय्.

How come that /AtAm and /AthAm are /Git? Didn't you say (in page Why Gic ca) that replacements of /luG tenses do not inherit the /Git of the tense?

/AtAm doesn't inherit its /Git from /luG, it comes from sArvadhAtuk....

Do'h!