deriv SD cv (386) ashtadhyayi.com hei.de L 386 ETT STT a 8.2.80 ALPH OLDHOMEPAGE NEWHOMEPAGE

adaso 'ser dAd u do maH

अदसो ऽसेर्दादु दो मः ONPANINI 82080

If /adas- has no s स्, replace d द् + vowel with mu मु or mU मू.

/adas- mn + /sup
!**ada- अदॱ + /sup, by tyadAdInAmaH

/adas- f + /sup
adA- अदाॱ + /sup, by tyadAdInAmaH and ajAdyataSTAp

So first we add endings to ada अद mn or /adas- + Ap → adA अदा f normally, and after that, we replace da with mu मु, or dA दा de दे with mU मू (by the most alike rule, short u replaces short and long U replaces long).

Examples with mu मु replacing da

ada- अदॱ mn OR AdA- आदाॱ f + /osadayos अदयोस् → **amuyos अमुयोस् "of those two"

ada- अदॱ mn + /Giadasmin अदस्मिन् → **amuSmin अमुष्मिन् mn "in that"

ada- अदॱ f + /GiadasyAm अदस्याम् → **amuSyAm अमुष्याम् f "in that"

ada- अदॱ f + /Geada- अदॱ + /Ap + /Geadasyai अदस्यै → **amuSyai अमुष्यै f "for that"

Examples with mU मू replacing dA दा

**ada- अदॱ f + /jas OR /zasada- अदॱ + /Ap + as अस्adAs अदास् like azvAs अश्वास् → **amUs अमूस् f " s o those"

**ada- अदॱ n + /jas OR /zasadAni अदानि like **phalAni फलानि → **amUni अमूनि n " s o those"

**ada- अदॱ m + /zasadAn अदान् → **amUn अमून् m " o those"

Examples with mU मू replacing de दे dau दौ

**ada- अदॱ m + /auadau अदौ → **amU अमू m "these two"

**ada- अदॱ n + /auade अदे → **amU अमू n "these two"

**ada- अदॱ f + /auada- अदॱ + /Ap + /auadA- अदाॱ + /zIade अदे → **amU अमू f "these two"

Why do we say "if /adas- has no s स्"?

The s स् of /adas- gets erased before all /sup by tyadAdInAmaH. As supodhAtupr... never erases this /sup, the only forms with s स् appear when svamornapuMs... deletes /su /am

/adas- n + /su OR /am
→ **adas अदस् n by svamornapuMs...

and when adasa::aus... deletes /su

/adas- mf + /su → **asau असौ by adasa::aus... ff

Wait, we say **amISu अमीषु, how come this rule teaches amUSu?

The right form is **amISu अमीषु, from the exception eta::Idbah... >.

/adas- + /sup' → **amISu अमीषु

**ada- अदॱ m + /au
adau अदौ
!**amU अमू m "those two" by this rule

**ada- अदॱ n + /au
→ **ada- अदॱ + /zI by napuMsakAcca
ade अदे
→ **amU अमू n "those two" by this rule

**ada- अदॱ f + /au
ada- अदॱ + /Ap + /au
adA- अदाॱ + /zI by auGa::ApaH
ade अदे
→ **amU अमू f "those two" by this rule

ada- अदॱ mf + /os
adayoH अदयोः, like **tayos तयोस् or **azvayos अश्वयोस्
!**amuyos अमुयोस् "of / in those two" by this rule

ada- अदॱ mn + /Gi
adasmin अदस्मिन्, like **tasmin तस्मिन् or **sarvasmin सर्वस्मिन्
amusmin अमुस्मिन् by this rule
amuSmin अमुष्मिन् with /Satvam
!**amuSmin अमुष्मिन् mn "in that"

ada- अदॱ f + /Gi
adA- अदाॱ + /Gi
adasyAm अदस्याम्, like **tasyAm तस्याम् or **sarvasyAm सर्वस्याम्
amusyAm अमुस्याम् by this rule
amuSyAm अमुष्याम् with /Satvam
!**amuSyAm अमुष्याम् f "in that"

ada- अदॱ f + /Ge
ada- अदॱ + /Ap + /Ge
ada- अदॱ + syai स्यै, like **tasyai तस्यै or **sarvasyai सर्वस्यै
amusyai अमुस्यै by this rule
amusyai अमुस्यै with /Satvam
!**amuSyai अमुष्यै "for that"

**ada- अदॱ f + /jas OR /zas
ada- अदॱ + /Ap + /jas OR /zas
adAs अदास् like **azvAs'' अश्वास्ऽऽ f or **azvAs' अश्वास्ऽ f
!**amUs अमूस् f "those" by this rule

ada- अदॱ m + /zas
adAn अदान् like **azvAn अश्वान्
!**amUn अमून् m "those" by this rule

ada- अदॱ n + /jas OR /zas
ada- अदॱ n + /zi by jazzasozziH
adAni अदानि like **phalAni फलानि
!**amUni अमूनि n "those" by this rule

I can't disassemble the original sUtra.

See wording of adasose.

na bha;kur;churAm < 82080 adaso 'ser dAd u do maH > eta:: Id bahuvacane
adasa:: au sulopaz ca <<< L 386 >>> eta:: Id bahuvacane