deriv SD cv (756) ashtadhyayi.com hei.de L 756 ETT STT a 1.2.9 ALPH OLDHOMEPAGE NEWHOMEPAGE

iko jhal इको झल् ONPANINI 12009

/jhal after /ik.

Or, more longwindedly —

After an /ik, (/san is /kit when it is) /aniT.

Being /kit debars /guNa (see hardsoft, kGitica).

Examples —

ji जि → **jigISati जिगीषति with g ग् from sanliTorjeH

yu यु → yuyUSati युयूषति

kR कृ → **cikIrSati चिकीर्षति

tRR तॄ → titIrSati तितीर्षति

bhU भू → bubhUSati बुभूषति

The lengthening is from ajjhanagam....

Can you show an example of /san getting /iT?

/san becomes iSa इष after smi स्मि. As this rule does not apply, iSa इष is not /kit, and smi स्मि takes gbS normally —

smi स्मि + /san + /laT /tip
→ smi स्मि + smi स्मि + iSa इष + /tip by sanyaGoH and ekAcodvepr...
→ si सि + smi स्मि + iSa इष + /tip by zeSelopaH hole
→ si सि + sme स्मे + iSa इष + /tip by gbS
→ si सि + smay स्मय् + iSa इष + /tip by ecoyavAyAvaH
→ !**sismayiSati सिस्मयिषति

Why do we say "after an /ik"?

/san is not /kit in

pipAsati पिपासति

HOLE

NeraniTi

ApjJapyRdhAm...

Wait, shouldn't ajjhanagam... make a long anyway, debarring the /guNa? This sUtra looks unnecessary.

It IS unnecessary to form the examples above. However, if you were to erase this sUtra from the grammar, then other words (like jJIpsati ज्ञीप्सति "he wishes to inform") could not be formed. See candravasu for details.