deriv SD cv (545) ashtadhyayi.com hei.de L 545 ETT STT a 3.4.80 ALPH OLDHOMEPAGE NEWHOMEPAGE

thAsas se थासः से ONPANINI 34080

But /se''' replaces /thAs (in the /Tit tenses).

Exception to < Tita::Atman....

TitaH ityeva टितः इत्येव. Tito lakArasya yaH thAs tasya sezabda Adezo bhavati टितो लकारस्य यः थास्तस्य सेशब्द आदेशो भवति.

The /thAs that replaces a /Tit tense is replaced with se से.

Examples —

pac पच् + /laT /thAs
→ **paca- पचॱ + /thAs
→ **paca- पचॱ + /se''' by this rule
→ !**pacase पचसे "you' cook for yourself"

pac + /liT /thAs → **peciSe पेचिषे "you' cooked"

pac + /luT /thAs → !**paktAse पक्तासे "you gonna cook"

pac + /lRT /thAs → !**pakSyase पक्ष्यसे "you'll cook"

pac + /loT /thAs
→ pac + /se''' by this rule
→ pac + /sva''' by savAbhyAMvAm... 11>
→ !**pacasva पचस्व "cook it for thyself"

More examples —

pac- पच् + /liT /thAs
→ **papac- पपच् + /liT /thAs
→ papac- पपच् + /se''' by this rule
→ papac- पपच् + iSe इषे by !!
→ **pec- पेच् + iSe इषे
→ !**peciSe पेचिषे "you' cooked for yourself"

dRz- दृश् + /liT /thAs
→ **dadRz- ददृश् + /liT /thAs
→ **dadRz- ददृश् + /se''' by this rule
→ **dadRz- ददृश् + (/iT + /se''') by !!
→ **dadRz- ददृश् + iSe इषे with /Satvam
→ !**dadRziSe ददृशिषे "you' saw"

Hmmm pac पच् and dRz दृश् are in the list of aniT roots, so how come /se''' gets /iT as if it were a /seT?

coulson says about the matter that the affixes are actually iSe hole.. omfg.

Hmm idk sorry. I apologize.

See iT of liT.

iSe इषे is soft, so why is there no gbS?

/thAs is /apit. By asaMyogAll..., /thAs is /kit when not after a cluster. So kGitica debars the gbS.