71009 After
71010 Crazily in the vedas.
71011 Not after k-less
71012
71013
71014 to
71015
71017
71018
71019 after neuter.
71020
71021 After
71022 After sixlike, to
71023
71024 After
Example --
See also the exceptions nedamadasorakoH and bahulaJchandasi.
Careful: chant this rule with
Will this work after
No. It's after
Why is this rule chanted with
Because we must replace
KAZIKA akArAntAdaGgAduttarasya bhisaH aisityayam Adezo bhavati. vRkSaiH. plakSaiH. atijarasaiH. jarAmatikrAntaiH iti vigRhya samAse kRte hrasvatve ca bhisa aisAdezo bhavati. ekadezavikRtamananyavad bhavati iti jarazabdasya jarasAdezaH. sannipAtalakSaNo vidhiranimittaM tadvighAtasya iti paribhASA iyam anityA, kaSTAya kramaNe 31014 iti nirdezAt. ataH iti kim? agnibhiH. vAyubhiH. taparakaraNaM kim? khaTvAbhiH. mAlAbhiH. etvam bhisi paratvAc cedata ais kva bhaviSyati. kRte 'pyetve bhautapUrvyAdais tu nityas tathA sati. ataH ityadhikAro jasaH zI iti yAvat.
vedic rule. Exception to atobhisa. The vedas, like cats, do whatever they want. So sometimes there is no
And other times there is
Elsewhere than in the vedas, only
KAZIKA chandasi viSaye bahulamaisAdezo bhavati. ataH ityuktam, anato 'pi bhavati nadyaiH iti. ato na bhavati , devebhiH sarvebhiH proktam iti.
Ahem. Didn't you tell us that you were not going to translate any vedic rules, because you weren't interested in the vedas, and because they would just confuse us if we studied them too soon?
Correction. I shlould have said that y'all shouldn't worry about vedic rules or about accent rules. Yet you must still know that they exist, and how they work, and how they are mixed with the ordinary rules. So I translated a few. Just don't memorize them, okay? That'd be a waste of good neuron. I do this with rule ze too.
there is no atobhisa::ais in
idam- "this" + bhis
adas- "that" + bhis
Details:
idam- "this" + bhis →
Why do we say "k-less"?
These only have
Wait. A rule that predicts the future?
Yessir. Good thing
Example of TA to
Gasi to
KAZIKA akArAntAd aGgAd uttareSAm TA-Gasi-GasAm ina At sya ityete AdezAH bhavanti yathA-saGkhyam. TA ity etasya in'-Adezo bhavati. vRkSeNa. plakSeNa. Gasi ityetasya At. vRkSAt. plakSAt. Gasityetasya syAdezo bhavati. vRkSasya. plakSasya. ataH iti kim? sakhyA. patyA. atijarasina, atijarasAt iti kecid icchanti. yathA tu bhASye tathA na etad iSyate iti lakSyate.
KAZIKA Ger iti caturthy-ekavacanasya grahaNam. akArAntAd aGgAd uttarasya Ge ity etasya yaH ityayam Adezo bhavati. vRkSAya. plakSAya. ataH iti kim? sakhye. patye. sannipAtalakSaNo vidhiranimittaM tadvighAtasya iti paribhASeyam anityA, tena dIrgho bhavati.
What's that
It means "replace Ge", by SaSThIsthAneyogA. It was made from
If
I wish I knew.
(Getosmaiafteraenderpro) (!sarvanAmnass)
Example --
tad- + Ge →
As in --
See also Gasi;GyoH smAt;sminau right below.
KAZIKA akArAntAt sarvanAmnaH uttarasya GeH smai ity ayam Adezo bhavati. sarvasmai. vizvasmai. yasmai. tasmai. kasmai. ataH ityeva, bhavate. atho 'tra asmai ity anvAdeze 'zAdeze ekAdezaH prApnoti? tatra antaraGgatvAd ekAdezAt pUrvaM smaibhAvaH kriyate pazcAd ekAdezaH iti.
Examples of Gasi to
tad- + Gasi →
sarva- + Gasi
Examples of Gi to
tad- + Gi
sarva- + Gi
kim- + Gi →
As in --
Instead of
KAZIKA Gasi Gi ity etayor akArAntAt sarvanAmnaH uttarayoH smAt smin ity etAv Adezau bhavataH. Gasi ity etasya smAt. sarvasmAt. vizvasmAt. yasmAt. tasmAt. karmAt. Gi ity etasya smin. sarvasmin. vizvasmin. yasmin. tasmin. anyasmin. ataH ity eva, bhavataH. bhavati. sarvanAmnaH ity eva, vRkSAt. vRkSe.
In other words,
The
Examples --
sarva- m + jas
tad- m + jas →
There are other
This te'''' is not a hanger, so it can start a sentence (unlike te'').
Same thing as saying that Ap and au add up to
Example --
KAZIKA AbantAdaGgAduttarasya auGaH zI ityayam Adezo bhavati. khaTve tiSThataH. khaTve pazya. bahurAje. karISagandhye. GakAraH sAmAnyagrahaNArthaH, auTo 'pi grahaNaM yathA syAt. aukAro 'yaM zIvidhau GidgRhIto GiccAsmAkaM na asti ko 'yaM prakAraH. sAmAnyArthas tasya ca asaJjane 'smin GitkAryaM te zyAM prasaktam sa doSaH. Gittve vidyAd varNanirdezamAtraM varNe yat syAt tac ca vidyAt tadAdau. varNazcAyam tena Gittve 'pyadoSo nirdezo 'yaM pUrvasUtreNa vA syAt.
What does that
"Replace TA", by SaSThIsthA.
Why didn't
I'm not sure. For some reason
The
Examples --
If the neuter ends in
This zI affix appears --
after all neuters, by this rule
after masculine pronouns, by jasazzI
after Ap, by auGa::ApaH
Don't confuse this zI affix with the zi affix, that has short
KAZIKA napuMsakAd aGgAd uttarasya auGaH zI ity ayam Adezo bhavati. kuNDe tiSThataH kuNDe pazya. yasyeticeti lopaH prAptaH. zyAM pratiSedho vaktavya iti na bhavati. dadhinI. madhunI. trapuNI. jatunI.
I have a doubt about
Well. The rule actually does say that. But in fact
jas and zas must always be replaced with zi after a neuter.
The
Examples --
If the neuter nounbase does not end in
See also summary of prathamau after neuter .
KAZIKA napuMsakAdaGgAduttarayoH jazzasoH zi ity ayam Adezo bhavati. kuNDAni tiSthanti. kuNDAni pazya. dadhIni. madhUni. trapUNi. jatUni. jasA sahacaritasya zaso grahaNAd iha na bhavati, kuNDazo dadAti, vanzaH pravizanti iti.
The
Example --
If we didn't choose to make aSTana::A work, this rule does not work --
So, this rule may be reworded as "
KAZIKA azTAbhyaH iti kRtAkAro 'STanzabdo gRhyate. tasmAduttarayoH jazzasoH auzityAdezo bhavati. aSTau tiSThanti. aSTau pazya. kRtAkArasya grahaNaM kim? aSTa tiSThanti. aSTa pazya. etadeva kRtAtvasya grahaNaM jJApakam aSTana A vibhaktAv ity Atva-vikalpasya. SaDbhyo lug ity asya ayam apavAdaH, nAprApte tasminn idam Arabhyate. yas tu supo dhAtuprAtipadikayor iti, tasmin prApte ca aprApte ca iti sa na bAdhyate, aSTaputraH, aSTabhAryaH iti. tadantagrahaNam atra iSyate. paramASTau. uttaramASTau. priyASTanaH ityatrAtvasya abhAvAdauztvaM na bhavati.
Example --
As in
KAZIKA SaTsaMjJakebhya uttarayoH jazzasor luk bhavati. SaT tiSThanti. SaT pazya. paJca. sapta. nava. daza. SaTpradhAnAt tadantAdapi bhavati. uttamaSat. yatra tu upasarjanaM SaT tato na bhavati, priyaSaSaH, priyapaJcAnaH iti.
Examples --
As in --
See exception atom below.
KAZIKA su am ityetayoH napuMsakAduttarayoH lug bhavati. dadhi tiSThati. dadhi pazya. madhu tiSThati. madhu pazya. trapu. jatu. tadbrAhmaNakulam ityatra lukA tyadAdyatvaM 7-2-102 bAdhyate, pUrvavipratiSedhena nityatvAd vA. luko hi nimittam 'ato 'm' 7-1-24 iti lakSaNAntareNa vihanyate, na punastyadAdyatvena eva. 'yasya ca lakSaNAntareNa nimittaM vihanyate na tadanityaM bhavati' (pari. 47).
Exception to svamorna. Examples --
KAZIKA akArAntAn napuMsakAd uttarayoH svamor am ity ayam Adezo bhavati. kuNDaM tiSThati. kuNDaM pazya. pITham. makAraH kasmAn@ na kriyate? dhIrghatvaM prApnoti.
Wait. In your last example, you are replacing am with am. Isn't that the same thing as not doing anything at all?
It is, yes.
But that feels wrong. You might have translated the rule as "after neuter
That wouldn't have worked. Such a wording would have made svamorna work on
Oh. Then, you might have translated the rule as "after neuter
Indeed I might have. You too may translate it that way if you want.