→ 72114 replacements before soft
72087 before second.
72088 First dual in the
72089
72090 Otherwise to
72092
72093
72094 Before
72095
72096
72097 Otherwise
72099 Feminine
72100
72102
72103
72104 to
72105
72106 Nonfinal
72107
72108
72109
72110
72111
72112
72113 Delete the
Before the second affixes am au zas, we replace yuSmad- asmad- with
yuSmad- + am →
asmad- + am →
yuSmad- +
asmad- + au
yuSmad- + zas →
asmad- + zas
Back to
KAZIKA dvitIyAyAM ca parataH yuSmad-asmadoH AkArAdezo bhavati. tvAm. mAm. yuvAm. AvAm. yuSmAn. asmAn. AdezArthaM vacanam.
This rule is necessary because yuSmadasmadoranAdeze cannot work on the am that replaced au or the
Notice that this rule does not work on first au, only on second au. Before first au, we say
Two examples only --
yuSmad- +
asmad- +
See dvitIyAyAMca or yuvAvaudvivacane for the small details.
Back to
KAZIKA prathamAyAzca dvivacane parato bhASAyAM viSaye yuSmadasmadoH AkArAdezo bhavati. yuvAm. AvAm. prathamAyAH iti kim? yuvayoH. AvayoH. dvivacane iti kim? tvam. aham. yUyam. vayam. bhASAyAm iti kim? yuvaM vastrANi pIvasA vasAthe.
The "in the laukika" is necessary because the veda has
Examples --
yuSmad- + TA
asmad- + TA
This rule will not work before the sup that have been replaced. For instance, ekavacanasyaca replaces Gasi with
Back to
KAZIKA ajAdau vibhaktau anAdeze yuSmadasmadoH yakArAdezo bhavati. tvayA. mayA. tvayi. mayi. yuvayoH. AvayoH. aci iti kim? yuvAbhyAm. AvAbhyAm. yuSmadasmadoranAdeze ity atra yadi hali iti anuvartate, zakyamakartum aci iti etat? tat kriyate vispaSTArtham. an-Adeze ityeva. tvad gacchati. mad gacchati.
Rule yuSmad;asmadora explains what happens before consonant sup.
The previous rules, such as prathamAyAzca, took care of the dual endings, and of all second third seventh. So this one will remove the
yuSmad- + su
asmad- + bhyas
asmad- + sup'
Back to
There are exactly six examples:
yuSmad- +
asmad- +
Back to
KAZIKA yuvAm. AvAm. maparyantasya iti kim? yuvakAm, AvakAm iti sAkackasya mA bhUt. tva-mAv ekavacane tvayA. mayA. maparyantasya iti kim? sarvasya mA bhUt. tathA ca sati tvamayorakArasya yo 'cIti yakAre kRte aniSTaM rUpaM syAt. mAntasya ityeva siddhe asmin yat parigrahaNaM kRtam, avadhidyotanArthaM tat. mAnte mA bhUt. kadA? yadA NyantayoH kvipi mAntatvaM vidyate yuSmadasmadoH. sthAnivattvaM ca Neratra kvau lutatvAn na vidyate. yuvAvau dvivacane
After first au, this rule does work all the same, but then the lengthening is not made by yuSmadasmadoSSa as shown above, but by prathamAyAzca. This way we always get
So this rule changes
yuSmad- + jas
asmad- + jas
Back to
KAZIKA yuSmad-asmadoH maparyantasya jasi parato yUya vaya ity etAv Adezau bhavataH. yUyam. vayam. paramayUyam. paramavayam. atiyUyam. ativayam. tadantavidhir atra bhavati, aGgAdhikAre tasya ca taduttarapadasya ceti.
The only examples are tvam and aham --
yuSmad- + su →
asmad- + su →
Back to
KAZIKA yuSmadasmador maparyantasya sau pare tva aha ityetau Adezau bhavataH. tvam. aham. paramatvam. paramAham. atitvam. atyaham.
KAZIKA yuSmadasmador maparyantasya sau pare tva aha ityetau Adezau bhavataH. tvam. aham. paramatvam. paramAham. atitvam. atyaham.
Only examples --
yuSmad- + Ge →
asmad- + Ge
These
Back to
This makes
yuSmad- + Gas
asmad- + Gas →
Instead of
Back to
This rule only works when none of the above rules (such as tubhyamahyauGayi or tvAhausau) replaces
Half of those in detail --
yuSmad- + TA →
asmad- + TA →
yuSmad- + am →
Back to
KAZIKA ekavacane ity artha-nirdezaH. ekavacane ye yuSmadasmadI ekArthAmidhAnaviSaye tayor maparyantasya sthAne tva ma ityetAvAdezau bhavataH. tvAm. mAm. tvayA. mayA. tvat. mat. tvayi. mayi. yadA samAse ekArthe yuSmadasmadI bhavataH, samAsArthasya tvanyasaGkhyatvAt dvivacanaM bahuvacanaM vA bhavati, tadApi tvamAvAdezau bhavataH. Adez%AntarANAM tu tvAhau sau 72094 ity evam AdInAM viSaye pUrva-vipratiSedhena te eveSyante. atikrAntaH tvAm atitvam. atyaham. atikrAntau tvAm atitvAm. atimAm. atikrAntAn tvAm atitvAn. atimAn. atikrAntAbhyAm tvAm atitvAbhyAm. atimAbhyAm. atikrAntaiH tvAm atitvAbhiH. atimAbhiH. ity evamAdyudAhartavyam.
Examples --
tri- + jas
( RtoGi did not work before jas because of acira::RtaH)
( nAmi did not work here because of exception natisRcatasR)
RnnebhyoGIp did not work on any of those, because of na SaT-svasr-AdibhyaH.
KAZIKA tri catur ity etayoH striyAM vartamAnayoH tisR catasR ityetAvAdezau bhavato vibhaktau parataH. tisraH. catasraH. tisRbhiH. catasRbhiH. striyAm iti kim? trayaH. catvAraH. trINiM. catvAri. striyAm iti ca etat tricaturoreva vizeSaNaM na aGgasya. tena yadA tricatuHzabdau striyAm, aGgaM tu liGgAntare, tadA 'py Adezau bhavata eva. priyAH tisro brAhmaNyo 'sya brAhmaNasya priyatisA brAhmaNaH. priyatisrau, priyatisraH. priyatisR brAhmaNakulam, priyatisRNI, priyatisRRNi. priyacatasA, priyacatasrau, priyacatasraH. priyacatasR, priyacatasRNI, priyacatasRRNi. nadyRtazca 5-4-153 iti samAsAnto na bhavati, vibhaktyAzrayatvena tisRbhAvasya bahiraGgalakSaNatvAt. yadA tu tricatuHzabdau liGgAntare, striyAm aGgam, tadA Adezau na bhavataH. priyAH trayo 'syAH, priyANi trINi vA asyAH brAhmaNyAH sA priyatriH. priyatrI, priyatrayaH. priyacatvA, priyacatvArau, priyacatvAraH. tisRbhAve saMjJAyAM kanyupasaGkhyAnaM kartavyam. tisRkA nAma grAmaH. catasaryAdyudAttanipAtanaM kartavyam. catastraH pazya ity atra caturaH zasi 61137 ityeSa svaro mA bhUt. catasRNAm ityatra tu SaTtricaturbhyo halAdiH
Exception to prathamayo.
Examples --
KAZIKA tisR catasR ityetayoH RtaH sthAne rephAdezo bhavati ajAdau vibhaktau parataH. tisraH tiSThanti. tisraH pazya. catasraH tiSThanti. catasraH pazya. priyatisraH Anaya. priyAcatasraH Anaya. priyatisraH svam. priyacatasraH svam. priyatisri nidhehi. priyacatasri nirdhehi. pUrvasavarNottvaGisarvanAmasthAnaguNAnAm apavAdaH. paramapi GisarvanAmasthAnaguNaM pUrvavipratiSedhena bAdhate. aci iti kim? tisRbhiH. catasRbhiH. RtaH iti kim? tisR-catasroH pratipatty-artham, anyathA hi tad-apavAdaH tri-caturor eva ayam Adezo vijJAyeta.
The tyadAdi are the eight pronoun nounbases --
This rule changes them into --
before all vibhakti. Examples:
tad- m + TA
tad- m + am
tad- f + am
tad- m + su
Of course, all nounbases always get some vibhakti by GyApprA. They only end up vibhakti-less after such a rule as svamorna or supodhA luks the vibhakti off. In that case, this rule does not work --
tad- n + su →
Or, if you prefer to explain things that way, this rule works always, but its effect on tad- is rolled back by svamorna and supodhA (because nalumatA says so) -
tad- n + su
tad- + Gas +
See also kimaHka below.
KAZIKA tyadityevam AdInAm akArAdezo bhavati vibhaktau parataH. tyad syaH, tyau, tye. tad saH, tau, te. yad yaH, yau, ye. etad eSaH, etau, ete. idam ayam, imau, ime. adas asau, amU, amI. dvi dvau. dvAbhyAm. dviparyantAnAM tyadAdInAmatvamiSyate. iha na bhavati, bhavat bhavAn. saMjJopasarjanIbhUtAH tyadAdayaH pAThAdeva paryudastAH iti iha na bhavati, tyad, tyadau, tyadaH. atityad, atityadau, atityadaH. tyadAdipradhAne tu zabde bhavatyeva, paramasaH paramatau, parmate.
So,
kim- m + TA
kim- f + su
Unless supodhA or svamorna luk the
kim- n + su
kim- + Gi →
KAZIKA kim ity etasya kaH ityayam Adezo bhavati vibhaktau parataH. kaH, kau, ke. sAkackasya apy ayam Adezo bhavati, tena akAra eva kimo na vidhIyate kimo 't iti.
As in --
kim- + Gasi → kim- + tasil
The tasil is optional, so we can still say
The
kim- + Gasi →
As in Rgveda 10:129 --
KAZIKA ta-kAr'-Adau ha-kAr'-Adau ca vibhaktau parataH kim ity etasya kv ity ayam Adezo bhavati. kutaH. kutra. kuha. tihoH iti: ikAraH uccAraNArthaH.
Only example --
kim- + Gi →
KAZIKA atIty etasyAM vibhaktau parataH kim ity etasya kva ity ayam Adezo bhavati. kva gamiSyasi. kva bhokSyate. AdezAntara-vacanam orguNa nivRtty-artham. kimo Dvatiti pratyayAntaraM na vidhIyate, sAkackArtham.
This rule changes adas- tad- tyad- etad- into
adas- m + su →
tyad- m + su →
tad- m + su →
etad- m + su →
( sas and eSas will sometimes become
KAZIKA tyadAdInAM takAradakArayoH anantyayoH sakAr'-Adezo bhavati sau parataH. tyad syaH. tad saH. etad eSaH. adas asau. anantyayoH iti kim? he sa. sA.
Exception to tyadAdInAmaH. Only one example --
as in
KAZIKA adasaH sau parataH sakArasya aukArAdezo bhavati sozca lopo bhavati. asau. autvapratiSedhaH sAkackAd vA vaktavyaH sAdutvaM ca. yadA ca autvapratiSedhaH tadA sakArAduttarasya utvaM bhavati. asukaH. asukau. uttarapadabhUtAnAM tyadAdInAm akRtasandhInAm AdezA vaktavyAH. paramAham. paramAyam. paramAnena. adasaH sorbhavedautvaM kiM sulopo vidhIyate. hrasvAl lupyeta sambuddhir na halaH prakRtaM hi tat. Apa etvaM bhavet tasmin na jhalItyanuvartanAt. pratyayasthAcca kAditvaM zIbhAvazca prasajyate.
Of course thiswon't work when adas- is neuter --
as in
Exception to tyadAdInAmaH.
Only examples --
idam- f + su
idam- m + su
KAZIKA idamaH sau parataH makAro 'ntAdezo bhavati. iyam. ayam. idamo makArasya makAra-vacanaM tyadAdya-tva-bAdhan%Artham.
The same trick is used in rule atom, which replaces am with am just to make svamorna not work. Same thing in kupvoKkaFpauca.
So
As in --
idam- + am →
Because of exceptions, this rule will only work before au jas zas am.
There is an unrelated rule that sounds the same, daz ca x.
KAZIKA idamo dakArasya sthAne makArAdezo bhavati vibhaktau parataH. imau, ime. imam, imau, imAn.
This rule may be reworded into -- "masculine idam- with su makes
Only example --
idam- f + su →
KAZIKA idamo dakArasya yakArAdezo bhavati sau parataH. iyam. uttarasUtre puMsi iti vacanAt striyAmayaM yakAraH.
This rule won't work on the masculine because of the exception below, idoypuMsi.
This rule may be reworded into -- "masculine idam- with su makes
Only example --
As in --
KAZIKA idamaH idarUpasya puMsi sau parataH ayityayam Adezo bhavati. ayaM brAhmaNaH. puMsi iti kim? iyaM brAhmaNI.
Only examples --
idam- +
idam- + os
idam- f + TA
idam- mn + os
The exception "when it has no
KAZIKA idamaH akakArasya idrUpasya sthAne ana ityayam Adezo bhavati Api vibhaktau parataH. anena. anayoH. akaH iti kim? imakena. imakayoH. Api iti pratyAhAraH tRtIyaikavacanAt prabhRti supaH pakAreNa.
In more words -- idam- becomes
idam- mn + Gas →
ajAdyataSTAp works --
idam- f + Gas