61001 Replace the first onevowel part with two.
61002 the second of a vowelstarter.
61003 But not the
61004 Stammer is the first .
61005 Stammered are both.
61006
61008 Before
61009 before
61010 before
61011 before
61015
61016
61017 Before
61019
61037 No stretching before stretched.
61038 The
61039 This to
61040
61041 before
61042
61043
61044 optionally after
61045
61058
61064 Rootstarter
61065
61066
61067 One-letter
61068
61069 After
61071 Short gets
61072 Not before pause.
61073 before
61074
61075 non-wordfinal long .
61076 wordfinal optionally.
61077
61078
61079
61080 of root only if that affix made the
61081
Sometimes, we have to " reduplicate" roots, that is, we replace the first part of the root with two of the same. The first part is everything up to the first vowel. Examples --
The first part of
so "reduplicate
The first part of
so we replace
The first part of
so we replace
See also the exceptions below, ajAderdvi and nan;d;rAssaMyo.
You said that "sometimes" we reduplicate. When exactly?
When the rules liTidhA sanyaGoH zlau caGi below say so. Namely, before the affixes liT san yaG zlu caG.
Eample. Rule liTidhA teaches "reduplicate what is before liT". This means that when
KAZIKA adhikAro 'yam. ekAcaH iti ca, dve iti ca, prathamasya iti ca tritayam adhikRtaM veditavyam. ita uttaraM yad vakSyAmaH prAk saMprasAraNavidhAnAt tatra ekAcaH prathamasya dve bhavataH ity evaM tad veditavyam. vakSyati liTi dhAtoranabhyAsasya iti. tatra dhAtoravayavayasya anabhyAsasya prathamasya ekAco dve bhavataH. jajAgAra. papAca. iyAya. Ara. ekAca iti bahuvrIhinirdezaH. eko 'c yasya so 'yam ekAcityavayavena vigrahaH. tatra samudAyaH samAsArthaH. abhyantarazca samudAye 'vayavo bhavati iti sAckasya eva dvirvacanaM bhavati. evaM ca pacityatra yena eva acA samudAyaH ekAc, tenA eva tadavayavo 'cchabdaH pazabdazca. tatra pRthagavayavaikAc na dvirucyate, kiM tarhi, samudAyaikAjeva. tathA hi sakRcchAstrapravRttyA sAvayavaH samudAyo 'nugRhyate. papAca ityatra prathamatvaM vyapadezivadbhAvAt. iyAya, Ara ityatra ekActvam api vyapadezibhAvAdeva. dviHprayogazca dvirvacanam idam. AvRttisaGkhyA hi dve iti vidhIyate. tena sa eva zabdo dvirucAryate, na ca zabdAntaraM tasya sthAne vidhIyate.
Exception to ekAcodve. The roots that start with a vowel and have at least two vowels replace their second one-vowel part with two.
Example. The root
as in --
See exception nandrA right below.
KAZIKA prathamadvirvacanApavAdo 'yam. ajAder dvitiyasya ekaco dvirvacanam adhikriyate. acAdir yasya dhAtoH tadavayavasya dvitIyasya ekAco dve bhavataH. aTiTiSati. aziziSati. aririSati. arteH smipUGraJjvazAM sani
That root
I added san after root
That's complicated. Shouldn't you have used a root from the dhAtupATha for your example?
dhAtupATha roots that start with a vowel and have another vowel are very uncommon.
Well, UrNu is such a root. You could use that one as an example.
Exception to ajAderdvi. If the second part of a vowel-starter root starts with
Examples. The roots
As in --
KAZIKA (laghu) acaH parAH saMyogAdayo nadarA dvir na bhavanti. nuzabdasya dvitvam. UrNunAva. UrNunuvatuH. UrNunuvuH.
Why do we say "
Root
What's that
The root is listed in the dhAtupATha as
Where's the
It comes from a vArttika. This
When we replace one thing with two by the above rules, the first copy is called the stammer.
Example:
the stammer of
When we replace one part of a root with two by the above rules, the new root is a stammered.
Example. When ekAcodve replaces root
the stammer is the first
and the stammered is
There are two sorts of stammered --
(1) Those made by this rule (such as
(2) Those mentioned in the next rule, jakSityA (such as
KAZIKA dve iti vartamAne ubhegrahaNaM samudAyasaJjApratipattyartham. ye eve vihite te ubhe api samudite abhyastasaMjJe bhavataH. dadati. dadat. dadhatu. ubhegrahaNaM kim? nenijati ityatra abhyastAnAm AdiH iti samudAye udAttatvaM yathA syAt, pratyekaM paryAyeNa vA mA bhUtiti. abhyastapradezAH abhyastAnAm AdiH 6-1-189 ityevam AdayaH.
These seven special roots are stammered just because this rule says so, even though they weren't made by reduplicating other roots. They are all lukclass.
Being a stammered makes rule adabhyastAt work. Example --
It also prohibits the num from nAbhyastAccha. So
Why is
So that jhontaH won't work here --
The original rule means "
He dozed off, like Homer. Rest assured that he meant to include
Didn't you say last month in class that he never ever made a mistake?
See. In order to show respect to teachers, we never ask impertinent questions like that one in public. Welcome to Indian tradition.
KAZIKA abhyastam iti vartate. jakSa ity ayaM dhAtuH ityAdayazca anye SaT dhAtavaH abhyasta-saMjJA bhavanti. seyaM saptAnAM dhAtUnAm abhyasta-saMjJA vidhIyate. jakSa bhakSahasanyoH ityataH prabhRti vevIG vetinA tulye iti yAvat. jakSati. jAgrati. daridrati. cakAsati. zAsati. dIdhyate, vevyate ityatra abhyastAnAm AdiH ityeSa svaraH prayojanam. dIdhyat iti ca zatari vyatyayena sampAdite n' .AbhyastAc chatuH iti numaH pratiSedhaH.
Examples --
What about
Cannot reduplicate the sanAdyanta. See kAs;pratyayAdAmamantreliTi.
Examples --
Why is there no puganta in yuyutsa?
Because after ik-plus-hal,
The zluclass roots get zlu added. Then the zlu reduplicates the root by this rule, and disappears by pratyayasyaluk;zlu;lupaH.
bibhI +
dadA + jhi → dadA + ati''' →
The caG affix appears in some luG. Examples --
aT +
The caGi reduplication has some peculiarities --
every vowel except
The Nic affix disappears by NeraniTi,
the root vowel shortens by NaucaGyu,
and the vowel of the stammer is often long --
KAZIKA caGi parato 'nabhyAsasya dhAtoravayavasya prathamasya ekAco dvitIyasya vA yathAyogam dve bhavataH. apIpacat. apIpaThat. ATiTat. Azizat. Ardidat. pacAdInAM NyanatAnAm caGi kRte NilopaH, upadhAhrasvatvaM, dvirvacanam ityeSAM kAryANAM pravRttikramaH. tathA ca sanvallaghuni caGpare iti sanvadbhAvo vidhIyamAno hrasvasya sthAnivadbhAvAn na pratiSidhyate. yo hyanAdiSTAdacaH pUrvaH tasya vidhiM prati sthAnivadbhAvo bhavati. na ca asmin kAryANAM krameNAniSTAdacaH pUrvo 'bhyAso bhavati iti. ATiTatiti dvirvacane 'ci
The
Examples of vac svap yajjclass stretching before kit --
vac + kta
svap + kta
yaj + kta
yaj + liT mas → yaj + ma →
Examples of not stretching before Git --
svap + anti''' →
KAZIKA samprasAraNam iti vartate. SyaGaH iti nivRttam. vaci vaca paribhASaNe, bruvo vacir iti ca. svapi JiSvapa zaye. yajAdayaH yaja deva-pUjA-saMgati-karanadAnesu ityataH prabhRti AgaNAntAH. teSAM vacisvapi yajAdInAM kiti pratyaye parataH samprasAraNam bhavati. vaci uktaH. uktavA. svapi suptaH. suptavAn. yaja iSTaH. iSTavAn. vapa uptaH. uptavAn. vaha UDhaH. UDhavAn. vasa uSitaH. uSitavAn. veJutaH. utavAn. vyeJ saMvItaH ( halaH). saMvItavAn. hveJ AhUtavAn. vada uditaH. uditavAn. Tuozvi zUnaH. zUnavAn. dhAtoH svarUpa-grahaNe tatpratyayekAryaM vijJAyate. teneha na bhavati, vAcyate, vAcikaH iti.
The nine grahijyA roots are --
grah "grab, take" jyA "grow old" 01.0034
They stretch before kit and Git affixes.
Examples of stretching before the kit affixes ktvA and kta --
grah + ktvA
Examples of stretching before the Git affixes znA jhi za --
pracch + za + tip
In those examples, znA, jhi and za are Git because of rule hard
KAZIKA graha upAdAne, jyA vayohAnau, veJo vayiH 24041, vyadha tADane, vaza kAntau, vyac vyAjIkaraNe, ovrazcU chedane, praccha jJIpsAyAm, bhrasja pAke ityeteSAM dhAtUnAM GIti pratyaye parataH cakArAt kati ca saMprasAraNaM bhavati. graha gRhItaH. gRhItavAn. Giti gRhNAti jarIgRhyate. jyA jInaH. jInavAn. lvAdibhya iti niSThAnatvam. Giti jinAti. jejIyate. halaH iti samprasAraNadIrghe kRte pvAdInAM iti hrasvaH kriyate. vayi liTi parataH veJo vayiH AdezaH, tasya GidabhAvAt kidevodAhriyate. UyatuH. UyuH. yadyevaM vayigrahaNam anarthakam, yajAdiSu veJ paThyate? na evaM zakyam. liTi tasya veJaH 61040 iti pratiSedho vakSyate, tatra yathA eva sthAnivadbhAvAd vyervidhiH evaM pratiSedho 'pi prApnoti? na eSa doSaH. liTi vayo yaH 61038 iti yakArasya saMprasAraNapratiSedhAd vayervidhau grahaNaM pratiSedhe cAgrahaNamanumAsyate? satyam etat. eSa eva arthaH sAkSAn nirdezena vyeH spaSTIkriyate. vyadha viddhaH. viddhavAn. Giti vidhyati. vevidhyate. vaza uzitaH. uzitavAn. Giti uSTaH. uzanti. vyaca vicitaH. vicitavAn. Giti vicati. vevicyate. vyaceH kuTAditvamanasi pratipAditam, tena sarvatra aJNiti pratyaye samprasAraNaM bhavati, udvicitA, udvicitum, udvicitavyam iti. vrazceH vRkNaH. vRkNavAn. atha katham atra kutvaM, vrazcabhrasja iti hi Satvena bhavitavyam? niSThAdezaH SatvasvarapratyayavidhIDvidhiSu siddho vaktavyaH. tatra StvaM prati natvasya siddhatvAd jJalAdir niSThA na bhavati. kutve tu kartavye tadasiddham eva iti pravartate kutvam. Giti vRzcati. varIvRzcyate. praccha pRSTaH. pRSTavan. Giti pRcchati. parIpRchyate. praznaH. naGi tu prazne c' Asanna-kAle iti nipAtanAdasaMprasAraNam. bhrasja bhRSTaH. bhRSTavAn. Giti bhRjjati. barIbhRjyate. sakArasya jhalAM jaz jhazIti jaztvena dakAraH, stoH zcunA zcur iti zcutvena jakAraH.
This rule only works when the root has not been stretched, that is to say, when the liT is akit, as in --
See the other examples in the kAzikA.
This rule works before halAdizzeSaH can work --
KAZIKA ubhayeSAM vacyAdInAM grahyAdInAM ca liTi parato 'bhyAsasya samprasAraNaM bhavati. vaci uvAca. uvacitha. svapi suSvApa. suSvapitha. yaja iyAja. iyajitha. Duvap uvApa. uvapitha. grahyAdInAm tatra graher avizeSaH. jagrAha. jagrahitha. jyA jijyau. jijyitha. vayi uvAya. uvayitha. vyadha vivyAdha. vivyadhitha. vaza uvAza. uvazitha. vyaca vivyAca. vivyacitha. vRzcateH satyasati vA yoge na asti vizeSaH. yogArambhe tu sati yadi samprasAraNam akRtvA halAdizeSeNa repho nivartyate, tadA vakArasya samprasAraNaM prApnoti. atha rephasya samprasAraNaM kRtvA uradatvaM raparatvaM ca kriyate, tadAnI muradatvasya sthAnivadbhAvAt na samprasAraNe samprasAraNam iti pratiSedho bhavati ity asti vizeSaH. vavrazca. vavrazcitha. pRcchati bhRjjatyoravizeSaH. akidarthaM ca idam abhyAsasya samprasAraNaM vidhIyate. kiti hi paratvAd dhAtoH samprasAraNe kRte punaH prasaGgavijJAnAd dvirvacanam, UcatuH, UcuH iti. adhikArAdeva ubhayeSAM grahaNe siddhe punarubhayeSAm iti vacanaM halAdiH zeSam api bAdhitvA samprasAraNam eva yathA syAd iti. vivyAdha.
You say that this rule only works when the root has not been stretched. Why not? What happens if the root has been stretched?
In that case this rule does nothing, because it cannot. The stammer has already been stretched by other rules. See --
Why does inria conjugation give
Either inria is wrong or the kAzikA is. Ask hyderabad for its vote.
Only examples --
svap + yaG
vyeJ + yaG
KAZIKA JiSvapa zaye, syamu, svana, dhvana zabde, vyeJ saMvaraNe ityeteSAM dhAtUnAM yaGi parataH samprasAraNaM bhavati. soSupyate. sesimyate. vevIyate. yaGi iti kim? svapnak.
talkaround -- If some rule asks us to stretch, say,
Example. When rule zva;yuva tells us to stretch
This rule allows veJovayiH to make the forms
KAZIKA na samprasAraNam iti anuvartate. liTi parato vayo yakArasya samprasAraNaM na bhavati. uvAya, UyatuH, UyuH. liD-grahaNam uttar%Artham.
So instead of the
This rule won't work before akit liT, so we say
KAZIKA asya vayo yakArasya kiti liTi parato vakArAdezo bhavati anyatarasyAm. UvatuH, UvuH. UyatuH, UyuH. kiti iti kim? uvAya. uvayitha.
veJ before liT turns into
veJ + Nal →
See
KAZIKA liTi ityanuvartate. veJ tantusantAne ityasya dhAtoH liti parataH samprasAraNaM na bhavati. vavau, vavatuH, vavuH. kiti yajAditvAt dhAtoH prAptam akityapi liTyabhyAsasya ubhayeSAm 61017 ityabhyAsasya, ataH ubhayaM pratiSidhyate.
Exception to vacisvapi. lyap is kit because it replaced ktvA.
Example --
pra + veJ + lyap →
KAZIKA veJaH ity anuvartate. lyapi ca parto veJaH samprasAraNaM na bhavati. pravAya. upavAya. pRthagyogakaraNam uttar%Artham.
Example --
pra +
KAZIKA lyapi ityeva. jyA vayohAnau ityasya dhAtoH lyapi parataH samprasAraNaM na bhavati. prajyAya. upajyAya.
Exception to vacisvapi, that would have stretched vyeJ "hide" because lyap is kit.
Example --
pra +
KAZIKA lyapi ity eva. vyeJ saMvaraNe ity etasya dhAtoH lyapi parataH samprasAraNaM na bhavati. pravyAya. upavyAya. yoga-vibhAgaH uttar%ArthaH.
So ordinarily vacisvapi, because of previous rule, will not stretch the
pari +
But if we take this option --
pari +
KAZIKA lyapi ca vyaz ca iti anuvartate. parer uttarasya vyeJ ity etasya dhAtoH lyapi parataH vibhASA samprasAraNaM na bhavati. parivIya yUpam, parivyAya. samprasAraNe kRte parapUrvatve ca hrasvasya iti tuka prApnoti, sa halaH 64002 iti dIrghatvena paratvAd bAdhyate.
Why long
Rootfinal stretched vowels lengthen by halaH.
Shouldn't hrasvasya piti kRti tuk haveworked first?
Obviously no.
The roots that end in an ec in the dhAtupATha, like
Examples --
Counterexample before a zit --
KAZIKA dhAtoH iti vartate. ejanto yo dhAturupadeze tasya akArAdezo bhavati, ziti tu pratyaye na bhavati. glai glAtA. glAtum. glAtavyam. zo nizAtA. nizAtum. nizAtavyam. ecaH iti kim? kartA. hartA. upadeze iti kim? cetA. stotA. aziti iti kim? glAyati. mlAyati. kathaM jagle, mamle? na evaM vijJAyate, zakAra id yasya so 'yaM zititi, kiM tarhi, za eva it zit. tatra yasmin vidhistadAdAvalgrahaNe iti zidAdau pratyaye pratiSedhaH. ez zakArAnto bhavati. aziti iti prasajyapratiSedho 'yam, tena etadAttvam anaimittikaM prAgeva pratyayotpatter bhavati iti, suglaH, sumlaH iti Atazcopasarge
Will this rulework before ez?.
Ooopsie sorry. I mistranslated. The rule as
The label
dRz + tumun
Before kit, we get neither this rule nor puganta --
and before akit non- serious, we get puganta as usual --
You said somewhere else that kvip enders, such as the
Because this rule mentions
KAZIKA sRja visarge, dRzir prekSaNe ityetayoH dhAtvoH jJalAdAvakiti pratyaye parataH am Agamo bhavati. sraSTA. sraSTum. sraSTavyam. draSTA. draSTum. draSTavyam. laghUpadhaguNApavAdo 'yam amAgamaH. asrAkSIt. adrAkSIt. sici vRddhiH ami kRte bhavati, pUrvaM tu bAdhyate. jJali iti kim? sarjanam. darzanam. akiti iti kim? sRSTaH. dRSTaH. dhAtoH svarUpagrahaNe tatprataye kAryavijJAnAdiha na bhavati, rajjusRDbhyAm, devadRgbhyAm iti.
In other words: when the dhAtupATha shows a root that starts with
Examples. The roots
sic' + tip
abhi +
KAZIKA dhAtorAdeH SakArasya sthAne sakArAdezo bhavati. Saha sahate. Sica siJcati. dhAtugrahaNaM kim? soDaza. SoDan. SaNDaH. SaDikaH. AdeH iti kim? kaSati. laSati. kRSati. Adeza pratyayayor ity atra SatvavyavasthArtham SAdayo dhAtavaH kecidupadiSTAH. ke punas te? ye tathA paThyante. athavA lakSaNaM kriyate, ajdantyaparAH sAdayaH SopadezAH smisvidisvadisvaJjisvapitayazca, sRpisRjistRstyAsekSRvarjam. subdhAtuSThivuSvaSkatInAM satvapratiSedho vaktavyaH. SoDIyati. SaNDIyati. SThIvati. SvaSkate. SThivu ityasya dvitIyasthakAraSThakArazca iSyate. tena teSThIvyate, TeSThIvyate iti ca abhyAsarUpaM dvidhA bhavati.
The Nopadeza roots ("the ones taught with
This rule teaches that we must always replace the initial
In other words: this rule says that no roots start with
KAZIKA dhAtor AdeH ity anuvartate. dhAtor Ader NakArasya nakAra Adezo bhavati. NIJ nayati. Nama namati. Naha nahyati. dhAtvAdeH ity eva, aNati. sub-dhAtor ayam api neSyate, NakAram icchati NakArIyati. upasargAdasamAse 'pi Nopadezasya ity atra Natva-vidher vyavasthArthaM NAdayo dhAtavaH kecid upadiSyante. ke punas te? ye tathA paThyante. athavA lakSaNaM kriyate, sarve NAdayo NopadezAH, nRtI-nandi-nardi-nakka-nATi-nAthR-nAdhR-varjam.
If
Because rule upasargAdasamAse 'pi Nopadezasya only works on the Nopadeza roots.
My version of the dhAtupATha shows that root as nI, not
All of the
Examples --
But that
KAZIKA dhAtor iti prakRtaM yat tad dhAtvAdeH iti punar dhAtugrahaNAn nivRttam. tena dhAtoradhAtozca vakArayakArayoH vali parato lopo bhavati. div didivAn,didivAMsau,didivAMsaH. UyI - Utam. knUyI - knUtam. godhAyA Dhrak
These are some of the affected
these all lose
Example --
KAZIKA lopaH iti vartate. ver iti kvib-Adayo vizeSAnanubandhAnutsRjya sAmAnyena gRhyante. ver apRktasya lopo bhavati. brahmabhrUNavRtreSu kvip
Why do we bother to say "one-letter only"?
So that this rule won't affect the uNAdi affixes
Wait. You mentioned
Not true. Earlier I said kvin, meaning the affix
Examples of su to lopa after hal --
Examples of su to lopa after GI Ap --
Examples of t''' s''' to lopa after hal ---
Why does the rule say " long" GI Ap? Aren't those two always long?
No. Sometimes gostriyoru shortens them. Then this rule won't work, and the
Isn't the
You are partially right -- if that hal did not exist, indeed saMyogAnta would make
I understand how hal;Gy;AbbhyodIrghAt means "after hal and the GI Ap that have not been shortened". Might you please translate the other half of the rule,
It means " su and the sip tip that turned into one consonant". They can only turn into one consonant by itazca.
Is the
Hey, I chewed down everything else for you. You figure out why that
Examples after eG --
Examples after short --
Counterexample.
See also rules that delete the calling .
Yet,
Great poets break grammar sometimes. Doesn't mean you may do the same. You do that, I give you an F.
In morewords, the kRt affixes with
Examples with lyap --
pra +
Examples with kyap --
iN' + kyap
Examples with kvip --
The kvip enders do not get any feminine affix. The kyap-enders get ajAdyataSTAp.
KAZIKA piti kRti parato hrasvAntasya dhAtoH tugAgamo bhavati. agnicit. somasut. prakRtya. prahRtya. upastutya. hrasvasya iti kim? AlUya. grAmaNIH. piti iti kim? kRtam. hRtam. kRti iti kim? paTutaraH. paTutamaH. grAmaNi brAhmaNakulam ityatra hrasvasya bahiraGgasya asiddhatvAt tug na bhavati.
Why do we bother to say kRt affixes?
Because taddhita affixes may have
headline. The next rules (down to 61157) won't work before a pause.
Example. Rule ikoyaNaci below teaches "
either we make no pause between the words and ikoyaNaci works --
or we make a pause and the ikoyaNaci does not work, even though
ikoyaNaci will work compulsorily when adding affixes --
because pausing midword is ungrammatical.
We can reword this rule into --
"
Examples --
gam + laT tip →
sas +
You may spell the last two as
This rule is quite useless nowadays, because everybody pronounces only
KAZIKA hrasvasya tukiti vartate. chakAre parataH saMhitAyAM viSaye hrasvasya tugAgamo bhavati. icchati. yacchati. hrasva eva atra AgamI, na tu tadantaH. tena cicchadatuH, cicchiduH ity atra tukabhyAsasya grahaNena na gRhyate iti halAdiHzeSeNa na nivartyate, nAvayavAvayavaH samudAyAvayavo bhavati iti.
This rule teaches that the sound
AG +
mAG +
This is an exception to padAntAdvA, that says that after a wordfinal long vowel, the change is optional.
Most people make no difference between
" after AG mAG, always spell the sound
KAZIKA tukiti anuvartate, che iti ca. AGo Gita ISadAdiSu caturSvartheSu vartamAnasya, mAGazca pratiSedhavacanasya chakAre paratastugAgamo bhavati. padAntAd veti vikalpe prApte nityaM tugAgamo bhavati. ISadarthe ISacchAyA AcchAyA. kriyAyoge AcchAdayati. maryAdAbhividhyoH A cchAyAyAH AccAyam. mAGaH khalvapi mA cchaitsIt. mA cchidat. GidviziSTagrahaNaM kim? AchAyA, AcchAyA. pramAchandaH, pramAcchandaH.
Examples --
Think of this rule as a spelling rule: " If the sound
KAZIKA che tukiti vartate. dIrghAt paro yaH chakAraH tasmin pUrvasya tasya eva dIrghasya tugAgamo bhavati. hrIcchati. mlecchati. apacAcchAyate. vicAcchAyate.
The kAzikA shows the examples
What this rule is teaching us is that in
Nowadays everybody pronounces
" after a wordfinal long, spell the sound
KAZIKA dIrghAt che tukiti vartate. padAntAd dIrghAt paro yaH chakAraH tasmin pUrvasya tasya eva dIrghasya pUrveNa nityaM prApto vA tug-Agamo bhavati. kuTIcchAyA, kuTIchAyA. kuvalIcchAyA, kuvalIchAyA. vizvajanAdInAM chadasi vA tugAgamo bhavati iti vaktavyam. vizvajanacchatram, vizvajanachatram. nacchAyAM karavo 'param. na chAyAM karavo 'param.
Before vowel, we replace
Examples with
Examples with
Example with
There is an example of
See also the exceptions akassa, ikosava, RtyakaH.
KAZIKA aci parataH iko yaN-Adezo bhavati. dadhyatra. madhvatra. kartrartham. lAkRtiH. ikaH pluta-pUrvasya savarna-dIrgha-bAdhanArthaM yaN-Adezo vaktavyaH. bho3i indram. bho3yindram. aci iti ca ayam adhikAraH saMprasAraNAc ceti yAvat.
The ec are
This rule will always work as explained above inside words --
It will also work on a wordfinal ec --
And after that, rule lopazzA may work --
Yet, if the wordfinal is
IMPORTANT. Even though
Yet, when talking Sanskrit, you may still apply it or not as you wish. Therefore, the examples
KAZIKA ecaH sthAne aci parataH ayavAyAvityete AdezAH yathAsaGkhyam bhavanti. cayanam. lavanam. cAyakaH. lAvakaH. kayete. yayete. vAyAvavaruNaddhi.
Addition to ecoya, which replaces
Example before Nyat, a kRt affix --
Example before Nya, a taddhita. The taddhita do not trigger ( acoJNiti, but do trigger taddhiteSva --
Exception to vAntoyi above. If the
but not before other y-affixes, like this
Here the
These are built from
When the meaning of yat is not "can be", this rule does not work --
KAZIKA kSi ji ityetayor dhAtvoH yati ratyaye parataH zakyArthe gamyamAne ekArasya ayAdezo nipAtyate. zakyaH kSetum kSayyaH. zakyo jetum jayyaH. zakyArthe iti kim? kSeyaM pApam. jeyo vRSalaH.