chunk 51: 84040 stozz, STunA, doublings chunk 51: 84040 stozz, STunA, doublings→ FAKE RULES --------------------------------
84040
84041
84042 But no after wordfinal
84043
84044 after
84045 Wordfinal
84046 After
84047 before non-vowel.
84048
84053 serious to
84054 Delete fake h of the stammer.
84055 before
84056 Before pause too. But that's optional.
84057
84058 Before a
84059 But optionally if wordfinal.
84060
84061 After
84062 After stop, replace
84063
84065 , optionally delete a
84068
^ 
stu means "
So this rule replaces
This change happens to the
Example of
Example of
Example of
Example of
^ 
The expression
The STu letters are
So the stu (namely
Examples of
Examples of
Examples of
See also exceptions napadAntATToranAm and toSSi.
^ Exception to STunA. There is no STunA for the stu that follows a wordfinal Tu.
Examples with the words
See also DassidhuT.
^ Exception to STunA.
So no Tu replacement in --
Careful. Rule stozz has no analogous exception, so wordfinal tu doesn't stay before
^ 
Exception to stozz.
Notice that STunA has no similar exception -- the tu do NOT stay after
^ As in --
^ We may, if we want, replace such a consonant with its double consonant .
For instance, the word
You may say
In the manuscript spelling age, however, some people wrote
^ The rule is optional according to
See exception nAdinyA right below.
Even though pronouncing
If I can trust my ears, when chanting, this option appears to be always taken when the yar is after a short and before a yaN. So, my advice is that you should always chant
^ Exception to anacica. This rule makes it ungrammatical to double the first
When the eating is meant literally, this rule won't work. So we may say either --
or
^ (See also jhalAMjazonte rule above, "wordfinal serious to jaz".)
So the serious letters
And
And
For examples of
^ In more words --
"
Examples with roots reduplicating by
Rule hrasvaH says --
replace long vowel with short
Rule eca::igghra is a talkaround rule that clarifies --
when hrasvaH says " replace
^ All stops, wordfinal or not, before khar, turn into the most-alike of
Examples --
ap- + sup' →
^ Addition to kharica.
Examples:
^ Example --
^ In more words:
" before ku, replace M with
" before cu, replace M with
" before Tu, replace M with
" before tu, replace M with
" before pu, replace M with
Example with a wordfinal
Example with a nonwordfinal
Example with a nonwordfinal
See optional exception vApadAntasya.
^ The previous rule anusvA says that you must replace M, when it is before most consonants, with a nasalized similar of the consonant.
This rule says that when the M is wordfinal you may, if you wish, not do that replacement. You may pronounce the anusvAra sound as an anusvAra sound. So you may say either --
or
My personal advice is:
PLEASE FORGET THAT THIS OPTIONAL EXCEPTION EXISTS, AND APPLY anusvA ALWAYS, NO MATTER IF THE M IS WORDFINAL OR NOT.
See also
^ This is the same thing as saying --
" Before
That nasalized
Examples of
Examples of
^ 
Examples --
ud +
ud +
ud + 
Listen to that verse at --
^ 
Examples --
If we don't take the option --
^ 
According to
amauTchaS
In the alternative --
Even thought the rule is optional according to
See also rule zituk, that manages
never
^ 
So, here, we may delete the second
ud +
And here we may delete
This deletion is optional, so we may still say
^ Exception to tulyAsya. This rule states that, in spite of the fact that grammar rules such as tulyAsya and others consider
The
The
The kAzikA explains this rule very succintly:
Notice that the rule is badly written. In writing, the rule appears to be made of two equal
chunk 51: 84040 stozz, STunA, doublings