→ FAKE RULES --------------------------------
84040
84041
84042 But no after wordfinal
84043
84044 after
84045 Wordfinal
84046 After
84047 before non-vowel.
84048
84053 serious to
84054 Delete fake h of the stammer.
84055 before
84056 Before pause too. But that's optional.
84057
84058 Before a
84059 But optionally if wordfinal.
84060
84061 After
84062 After stop, replace
84063
84065 , optionally delete a
84068
stu means "
So this rule replaces
This change happens to the
Example of
Example of
Example of
Example of
The expression
The STu letters are
So the stu (namely
Examples of
Examples of
Examples of
See also exceptions napadAntATToranAm and toSSi.
Exception to STunA. There is no STunA for the stu that follows a wordfinal Tu.
Examples with the words
See also DassidhuT.
Exception to STunA.
So no Tu replacement in --
Careful. Rule stozz has no analogous exception, so wordfinal tu doesn't stay before
Exception to stozz.
Notice that STunA has no similar exception -- the tu do NOT stay after
As in --
We may, if we want, replace such a consonant with its double consonant .
For instance, the word
You may say
In the manuscript spelling age, however, some people wrote
The rule is optional according to
See exception nAdinyA right below.
Even though pronouncing
If I can trust my ears, when chanting, this option appears to be always taken when the yar is after a short and before a yaN. So, my advice is that you should always chant
Exception to anacica. This rule makes it ungrammatical to double the first
When the eating is meant literally, this rule won't work. So we may say either --
or
(See also jhalAMjazonte rule above, "wordfinal serious to jaz".)
So the serious letters
And
And
For examples of
In more words --
"
Examples with roots reduplicating by
Rule hrasvaH says --
replace long vowel with short
Rule eca::igghra is a talkaround rule that clarifies --
when hrasvaH says " replace
All stops, wordfinal or not, before khar, turn into the most-alike of
Examples --
ap- + sup' →
Addition to kharica.
Examples:
Example --
In more words:
" before ku, replace M with
" before cu, replace M with
" before Tu, replace M with
" before tu, replace M with
" before pu, replace M with
Example with a wordfinal
Example with a nonwordfinal
Example with a nonwordfinal
See optional exception vApadAntasya.
The previous rule anusvA says that you must replace M, when it is before most consonants, with a nasalized similar of the consonant.
This rule says that when the M is wordfinal you may, if you wish, not do that replacement. You may pronounce the anusvAra sound as an anusvAra sound. So you may say either --
or
My personal advice is:
PLEASE FORGET THAT THIS OPTIONAL EXCEPTION EXISTS, AND APPLY anusvA ALWAYS, NO MATTER IF THE M IS WORDFINAL OR NOT.
See also
This is the same thing as saying --
" Before
That nasalized
Examples of
Examples of
Examples --
ud +
ud +
ud +
Listen to that verse at --
Examples --
If we don't take the option --
According to
amauTchaS
In the alternative --
Even thought the rule is optional according to
See also rule zituk, that manages
never
So, here, we may delete the second
ud +
And here we may delete
This deletion is optional, so we may still say
Exception to tulyAsya. This rule states that, in spite of the fact that grammar rules such as tulyAsya and others consider
The
The
The kAzikA explains this rule very succintly:
Notice that the rule is badly written. In writing, the rule appears to be made of two equal