84040 stozz, STunA, doublings ←
Rules that mention particular roots work only before verb affixes, not before noun affixes.
First ending by default.
Owner gets sixth.
This is a vArttika, svarUpagrahaNe
Examples:
Rule sRjidRzo mentions the roots
Rule mRjervRddhiH won't work on
Counterexample:
Rule acoJNiti does not mention any roots. Therefore it is triggered by root affixes and by noun affixes too.
The vArttika
For instance, rule aciznu works on
Exception to sthAnivad.
Rule sthAnivad says that when we replace anything that has
Example. Here --
the tip affix replaced laG, but didn't get the
This exception is not a
"If no rule says which of the seven case groups of affixes must be used, the we must use first".
Rule GyApprA says that all nounbases always get a sup added after them, and if they are feminine, then maybe they a feminine affix before getting the sup. However that rule does not say WHICH of the twenty-one affixes it gets.
In a case like "I see the two lions", if I use the verb
Now, in
If I want to say "the two lions are being seen", with
The only difference between
when saying
but when saying
Other than that, grammar rules that affect
Example --
Rule uraNra says --
"rules that replace
Thanks to the principle "
"rules that replace
Example --
kLp + zap + te''' →
The sixth endings are used on the word that means the owner of something else. The something else can have any ending.
For instance, adding Gas after
we get
Examples --
This is not a
Which is the same thing as saying --
' the yaGluk roots get no zap. '
Exception to kartarizap, that gives zap to all sanAdyanta roots, including the yaG roots.
84040 stozz, STunA, doublings ←