chunk 33: 64019 cchvoz chunk 33: 64019 cchvoz
64019 Replace
64023 Delete
64024 Non-
64025
64026
64027 before
64030
64034
64036
64037 Some roots lose final nasal before serious
64038 optionally before
64039 But not before
64048 Erase
64051
64062
64064 Erase
64065
64066
64069 No before
64070 Optionally
64071 Before
64072 But vowel starters get
64074 But not in connection with
^ 
Before naG, that starts with a nasal --
Before kta (which is a kGit and starts with serious
^ 
Examples --
Back to rules that delete root nasal .
^ 
So, before a kGit affix, roots like
aJcu + kvin
Back to rules that delete root nasal .
^ Examples --
Back to rules that delete root nasal .
^
Back to rules that delete root nasal .
^ As in --
Back to rules that delete root nasal .
^ Exception to aniditA. aJcu is a non- idit
ud +
As in --
However, when aJcu means respecting, honoring, worshipping, its
As in --
Rule aJceH pUjAyAm sounds similar, so be careful.
Back to rules that delete root nasal .
^ This rule turns zAs into
Example before aG --
zAs + luG tip →
Example before kta, which is always kit and starts with
Example before tas, when rule sArvadhAtukamapit made it Git --
Counterexample before a vowel affix that is Git --
anu +
Counterexample before a consonant affix that is not kGit --
^ 
Some of those roots are
Examples before kit affixes that start with
Examples before tas tha that are Git by hard
See also optional exception vAlyapi right below and exception naktici below it.
Back to rules that delete root nasal .
See conjugation of
^ Optional exception to the previous rule. The roots that lose final nasal by the above rule before all serious kGit, may keep it before lyap.
Example.
AG +
Yet if there is a preverb, we may keep the
AG +
or lose it as usual --
AG +
A quick search for
^ Exception to anudAttopadeza and to anunAsikasyakvi. Even though ktic is a serious kGit, it does not make the roots
^ Examples. The root han sometimes turn into
han + luG →
han +
yuyutsa + u'
cikIrSa + tRc →
^ 
Exception to the rules that replace Nic with iyaG, yaN, guNa, vRddhi, or long. Before iT-less soft affixes, the Nic is dropped.
Example before Nvul --
Examples before yak --
kR + causative Nic + yak + laT ta →
^ This rule says that the four affixes sya sic sIyuT tAs, after certain roots, may get or not get a ciNvadiT or " ciN-like iT". That is a special sort of iT that makes the affix gain some of the side-effects of ciN.
Example. The ciN affix, being Nit, makes acoJNiti or ata::upa work, like here --
Now, sya is not Nit and makes no vRddhi of the root, just makes guNa by hardsoft. Also, sya gets no iT after root
However,
So we may say either
The ciN-likeness of the iSya iSic itAs
(A) acoJNiti and ata::upa make vRddhi
(B) Ato yuk ciN-kRtoH adds
(C) ho hanter JNin@;neSu turns han into
(D) ciN;Namulor dIrgho 'nyatarasyAm makes some roots lengthen optionally.
(E) Ner an-iTi erases Ni.
For examples of all, see the kAzikA.
^
Before iT --
pra + pra +
^ Examples --
as in --
^ Examples
with
with the ghu roots
abhi +
When used without a doer,
^ So ordinarily --
apa +
but if we take this option --
^ This works when the root starts with a consonant -- for vowelstarters, see the exception ADajAdInAm below.
Examples --
^ Exception to luGlaG. Vowel-starter roots get AT, not aT, before luG laG lRG.
This roughly means thatwe must replace the start vowel of the root with vRddhi.
Examples with
[ AT +
Examples with
AT +
AT +
AT + AT +
Example with an
AT +
^ The rules luGlaG and ADajA above add aT or AT in front of a root that carries luG or laG. By this exception, aT AT won't be added when mAG is connected by sense to the verb.
mAG is used to dissuade or prohibit, as in --
In these examples, the luG verbs did not get luGlaG. The same verbs with no
Inria flags the luG that lost aT or AT not with aor as usual, but as inj ( injunctive). Which is a misnomer because the form is not used just for negative commands, but also for negative suggestions, advice, and blessings.
chunk 33: 64019 cchvoz