72114 replacements before soft ←
→ 73101 some sup-changing rules
73050
73052
73054
73055 after stammer.
73057
73058
73067
73077
73078
73079
73080 Shorten pUclass .
73082
73083
73084 before hard and soft.
73085 Replace
73086 Replace nexttolast short
73088
73089 Replace last
73092
73093 gets
73094 optionally after
73096
73100 after
The affixes Thak and ThaJ always turn into
Example --
KAZIKA aGgasya nimittaM yaH ThaH, kazca aGgasya nimittam, pratyayaH, tasya pratyayaThasya ikaH ityayam Adezo bhavati. prAg vahateS Thak AkSikaH. zAlAkikaH. lavaNAT ThaJ 44052 lAvaNikaH. ThagAdiSu yadi varNamAtraM pratyayaH, uccAraNArtho 'kAraH, tadA iha api akAra uccAraNArthaH, varnamAtraM tu sthAnitvena upAdIyate. saGghAtagrahaNe tu pratyaye 'tra api saGghAtagrahaNam eva. tatra kaNeSThaH kaNThaH ityevam AdInAm uNAdInAm uNAdayo bahulam 33001 iti na bhavati. mathitaM paNyam asya mAthitikaH ityatra tu yasyeti ca iti lope kRte isusuktAntAt kaH 73051 iti sthAnivadbhAvAdikasya kAdezaH prApnoti, sannipAtalakSaNo vidhiranimittaM tadvighAtasya iti na bhavati. yasyeti ca iti lopasya sthAnivadbhAvAdvA. pUrvasmAd api hi vidhau sthAnivadbhAvaH.
The ghit meant here are the nounbases made with ghit affixes. The most common such affix is ghaJ, that makes masculine action nouns such as --
Examples with Nyat --
Why didn't this rule work in
In the rule itself, why did
Good. Your memory is improving. That exception is toHSi, and works before
Examples before the JNit affixes Nic and ghaJ --
Examples with
In the last example, rule ekAjutta did not work because
See also next rule, abhyAsAcca.
KAZIKA hanteH ha-kArasya kavarg'-Adezo bhavati Jiti Niti pratyaye parataH nakAre ca. ghAtayati. ghAtakaH. sAbhughAtI. ghAtaMghAtam. ghAto vartate. nakAre ghnanti. ghnantu. aghnan. haH iti kim? alo 'ntyasya mA bhUt. hanteH iti kim? prahAraH. prahArakaH. JNitpratyayo hanter vizeSaNam, nakAro hakArasya, nakAre 'nantarasya hantihakArasya iti. taccAnantarya zrutikRtaM sannipAtakRtam AzrIyate. sthAnivadbhAvazAstrakRtaM tu yadanAnantaryaM tadavighAtakam, vacanasAmarthyAt. yadyapi sarvair eva JNinnair hantihakAro viziSyate tathApi yena nAvyavadhAnaM tena vyavahite 'pi vacanaprAmANyAtiti JNiti dhAtvavayavena vyavahite 'pi sati bhavati. iha tu na bhavati, hananam icchati hananIyati, hananIyater Nvul hananIyakaH iti.
As in --
Example with
As in --
Example with
KAZIKA sani liTi ca pratyaye jeH aGgasya yo 'bhyAsaH tasmAd uttarasya kavarg“Adezo bhavati. jigISati. jigAya. san-liToH iti kim? jejIyate. jinAteH samprasAraNe kRte yadyapi jirbhavati, tathApi lAkSaNikatvAt tasya grahaNaM na bhavati, jijyatuH, jijyuH ityeva bhavati.
Why do we bother to say "before san and liT"?
This won't work before yaG --
Will this work on the
No; only the
What rules turned
kartarizap and atoguNe.
May I chant this rule as
Yes, you may.
With san --
With liT --
Why do we bother to say " of san liT "?
Won't work with yaG --
KAZIKA cinoteH aGgasya sanliTor abhyAsAd uttarasya vibhASA ka-varg'-Adezo bhavati. cicISati cikISati. cikAya, cicAya. sanliToH ity eva, cecIyate.
Exception to cajoHku.
My translation can be reworded into --
"
Only example --
Conterexample --
As in --
KAZIKA cinoteH aGgasya san;liTor abhyAsAd uttarasya vibhASA kavarg'-Adezo bhavati. cicISati cikISati. cikAya, cicAya. sanliToH ity eva, cecIyate.
There are exactly three examples --
gam + zap
Example sentences --
As in --
All examples --
Only the zapclass
The
The
Why is the
If it were called
These roots are 09.0043
Examples --
as in
Examples --
The puclass roots are --
Example --
KAZIKA mider aGgasya iko guNo bhavati ziti pratyaye parataH. medyati, medyataH, medyanti. ziti ityeva, midyate.
Shouldn't we be replacing the last letter of
No, as alontyasya has the exception ikoguNavRddhI.
This jus is the replacement of laG jhi made by sijabhyasta after a stammered.
This rule is necessary because jhi is Git by hard apit is
Examples with the stammered juhu and bibhI --
This rule works only on the laG jus coming from sijabhya, and not on the liG jus made by jherjus --
KAZIKA jusi ca pratyaye parataH igantasya aGgasya guNo bhavati. ajuhavuH. abibhayuH. abibharuH. atha cinuyuH, sunuyuH ityatra kasmAn na bhavati? atra hi dve Gittve, sArvadhAtukAzrayam, yAsuDAzrayaM ca. tatra na aprApte sArvadhAtukAzrayaGittvanimitte pratiSedhe jusi guNaH ArabhyamANaH tam eva bAdhate. yAsuDAzrayaGittvanimittaM tu na bAdhate, tatra hi prApte ca aprApte ca Arabhyate iti.
Why does this affect the ik only? The word
See ikoguNavRddhI.
In the classroom we ended up nicknaming this rule as "the hardsoft rule", as its true name is sort of clumsy.
All root affixes turn any ik that is just before them into guNa. Even the long ik.
Examples before the soft affixes tumun u thal --
Where is the
Plase read replacing with
Examples before the hards tip and zap --
If you see that this rule did not work it means that some exception came in the way.
The exception will be kGitica almost always --
In
Same in
I must confess that I have an awful tendency to type "because of puganta" when I mean "because of hardsoft". So please check puganta rule, just in case I mistyped the link that brought you here.
Exception to hardsoft above, and to all other rules that replace with guNa and vRddhi ( puganta, acoJNiti, etc). The root jAgR becomes
jAgR + Nic + laT tip
rule acoJNiti did not work.
However, before
jAgR + ciN →
jAgR + Nal →
nor here, as tas is Git because hard
jAgR + laT tas →
KAZIKA jAgu ityetasya aGgasya guNo bhavati aviciNNalGitsu parataH. jAgarayati. jAgarakaH. sAdhujAgarI. jAgaraMjAgaram. jAgaro vartate. jAgaritaH. jAgaritavAn. vRRddhiviSaye pratiSedhaviSaye ca yathA syAtiti jAgarterayaM guNaH Arabhyate. tasmin kRte yA ata upadhAyAH 72116 vRddhiH prApnoti sA na bhavati. yadi hi syAtanarthaka eva guNaH syAt, ciNNalozca pratiSedhavacanam anarthakam. aviciNNalGitsu iti kim? jRRzRRstRrjAgRbhyaH kvin jAgRviH. ciN ajAgAri. Nal jajAgAra. Git jAgRtaH. jAgRthaH. vi iti kecidikAram uccAraNArthaM varNayanti, kvasAvapi vakArAdau guNo na bhavati. jajAgRvAn. ajAgaruH, ahaM jajAgara ityatra pratiSedhaH prApnoti? na, apratiSedhAt. aviciNNalGitsu iti paryudAso 'yam, athavA jAgraH iti praptirasAvAnantaryAd viciNNalGitsu pratiSidhyate. yA tu jusi ca 73083, sArvadhAtukArdhadhAtukayoH 73084 iti ca prAptiH , sA na pratiSidhyate.
Replace the nexttolast
Examples --
kLp + zap + te'''
This rule won't work before kGit affixes (see kGitica) --
You only translated the second part of the rule, namely
It means that a handful of roots (the puk-enders, such as
You said that this affects short vowels, but
No. He said light but meant short. In the
Examples with bhU --
This rule will not work before affixes such as zap, that are hard but not tiG --
The
The lukclass root
KAZIKA bhU sU ity etayoH tiGi sArvadhAtuke guNo na bhavati. abhUt. abhUH. abhUvam. suvai, suvAvahai, suvAmahai. sUter lug-vikaranasya idaM grahaNam. suvatisUyayor vikaraNena tiGo vyavadhAnam. vikaraNasyaiva Git-tvAd guNAbhAvaH siddhaH. tiGi iti kim? bhavati. sArvadhAtuke ity eva, vyatibhaviSISTa. atha bobhavIti iti yaGluki guNapratiSedhaH kasmAn@ na bhavati? jJApakAt, yadayaM bobhUtu iti guNAbhAvArthe nipAtanaM karoti.
Two such roots are
With UrNu this rule is optional, so we may say either
KAZIKA sArvadhAtuke piti iti vartate. ukArAntasya aGgasya vRddhir bhavati luki sati halAdau piti sArvadhAtuke. yauti. yauSi. yaumi. nauti. nauSi. naumi. stauti. stauSi. staumi. utaH iti kim? eti. eSi. emi. luki iti kim? sunoti. sunoSi. sunomi. hali iti kim? yavAni. ravANi. piti ityeva, yutaH. rutaH. api stuyAd rAjAnam ityatra hi Gicca pinna bhavati iti pittvapratiSedhAd vRddherabhAvaH. na abhyastasya ityetadiha anuvartate, yoyoti, roroti ityevam Adyartham.
The
Examples --
Why do we say "before hal"? Don't all hard pit start with consonants?
Why "before pit"?
If the rule means
Just try to say
KAZIKA tRNaha ity etasyAGgasya im-Agamo bhavati hali piti sArvadhAtuke. tRNeDhi. tRNekSi. tRNehmi. atRNeT. varNAzraye 'py atra pratyayalakSaNam iSyate. hali iti kim? tRNahAni. piti ityeva, tRNDhaH. tRNaha iti AgataznaMko gRhyate, znami kRte imAgamo yathA syAtiti.
Careful. This titaugment
As in --
brU + laT tip
brU + laG tip →
Similarly
Please click brU. It is boxed.
Wait, shouldn't
What's the luG of
See bruvovaciH.
KAZIKA brU ity etasmAd uttarasya halAdeH pitaH sArvadhAtukasya IDAgamo bhavati. bravIti. bravISi. bravImi. abravIt. hali ityeva, bravANi. piti ityeva, brUtaH.
As in --
lAlap +
roru +
KAZIKA yaGaH uttarasya halAdeH pitaH sArvadhAtukasya IDAgamo bhavati vA. zAkuniko lAlapIti. dundubhir vAvadIti. tridhA baddho vRSabho roravIti maho devo martyAM A viveza. na ca bhavati. varvarti, carkarti cakram. halAdeH pitaH sArvadhAtukasya yaGantAdabhAvaH iti yaGlugantasya udAharaNam.
Why do you translate "after yaGluk" when the original has "after yaG"?
Just for clarity. When the yaG is not luked, kartarizap works, and zap starts with a vowel, so this rule won't work.
But, even if the yaG is luked we should get zap anyway. You said that all the sanAdyanta roots get zap.
I was wrong when I said that. There is a vArttika that says that
Hm. Someone had to write that vArttika. How did they figure out that pANini took it for granted that yaGluks are lukclass?
Because otherwise this rule would have been
Isn't that circular reasoning? Are you mocking me?
Unfortunately, no and no. That's how Indian Logic works. I swear.
"Gets IT" means that an
Examples after root as --
as + laG tip →
as + laG sip
Examples after sic --
mAG +
Uh. I'm confused. Where is the
Actually, it did follow a sic when it got the
And
That's a laG, not a luG. The
Why doesn't the mahAbhArata have that
The short explanation: that's ArSam. The long explanation: the
The rule, literally, says -- "One-letter affix (gets IT) after asti sic". Shouldn't Nal trigger this rule? It has one letter.
No. The word
Only examples --
KAZIKA ada bhakSaNe, asmAduttarasya apRktasya sArvadhAtukasya aDAgamo bhavati sarveSAm AcAryANAM matena. Adat. AdaH. apRktasya ityeva, atti. atsi.
Will this work in the luG?
No.
Why npot? What's the luG of ad?
KAZIKA ada bhakSaNe, asmAduttarasya apRktasya sArvadhAtukasya aDAgamo bhavati sarveSAm AcAryANAM matena. Adat. AdaH. apRktasya ity eva, atti. atsi.
72114 replacements before soft ←