ekAca:: upadeze 'nudAttAt ONPANINI 72010
After some one-vowel roots there's no iT.mmmmmmmmm ^ M+ C+ 747

Some one-vowel roots do not make the valAdi get iT.

According to rule valAdi soft gets iT , all valAdi soft affixes get iT in front after all roots. Yet this rule tells us that this does not happen after certain roots, for instance kSip dRz pac nI. We call those roots aniT roots.

Example. The root car is a normal root (a seT root) and makes rule valAdi soft gets iT work --

car + kta →ArdhadhAtukasyeD carita-

But this exception here says that rule valAdi soft gets iT will not work after some roots, such as kSip dRz pac nI kR --

kSip + kta → kSipta- "was thrown"

dRz + kta → dRzta- dRSTa- "was seen"

pac + kta → pacta- →coHkuH pakta →pacovaH pakva- "was cooked"

nI + ktvA → nItvA "after leading"

kR + tumun →hardsoft kartum "to do"

How do I know which roots exactly are affected by this rule?

My advice is: do not learn in advance which roots are affected with this. Wait until you find some form such as kSipta, where valAdi soft (here kta) got no it, then check if the root kSip is such a root. (If you want to disregard my advice, see seT aniT veT .)

KAZIKA upadeze ya ekAc dhAturanudAttazca tasmAdiDAgamo na bhavati. prakRtyAzrayo 'yaM pratiSedhaH. ke punarupadeze 'nudAttAH? ye tathA gaNe paThyante, ta eva vispaSTArtham aniTkArikAsu pravibhaktAH pradarzyante. aniTsvarAnto bhavati iti dRzyatAmimAMstu seTaH pravadanti tadvidaH. adantamRRdantamRtAM ca vRGvRJau zviDIGivarNeSvatha zIGzriJAvapi. guNasthamUdantamutAM ca rusnuvau kSuvaM tathorNotimatho yuNukSNavaH.

zry;ukaH kiti ONPANINI 72011
uk-enders and zri (are aniT) before kit.mmmmmmmmm ^ C+ 748

So the root zri "serve" 01.1044 is aniT before kit affixes, --

zri + ktvA zritvA "after serving"

and seT before the akit --

zri + tRc →ArdhadhAtukasyeD zri + itRc →hardsoft zre + itR →ecoya zrayitR- "server"

KAZIKA zri ity etasya uk-antAnAM ca kiti pratyaye parataH iD-Agamo na bhavati. zri zritvA. zritaH. zritavAn. ugantAnAM ca yutvA. yutaH. yutavAn. lUtvA. lUnaH. lUnavAn. vRtvA. vRtaH. vRtavAn. tIrtvA. vIrNaH. tIrNavAn. zryukaH iti kim? viditaH. kiti iti kim? zrayitA. zrayitum. zrayitavyam. kecid atra dvikakAra-nirdezena gakAraprazleSaM varnayanti, bhUSNuH ity evaM yathA syAt. sautratvAc ca nirdezasya zryukaH kiti ity atra cartvasya asiddhatvamanAzritya rorutvaM na kRtam visarjanIyazca kRtaH iti. glAjisthazca ksnuH ity atra sthA A ityAkAraprazleSeNa sthAsnoH siddhatvAn na kiMcidetat. upadeze ityeva, tIrNa ityatra api yathA syAt. itve hi kRte raparatve cana syAt. mA bhUdevam. iT sani veti vikalpe vihite yasya vibhASeti niSThAyAM pratiSedho bhaviSyati? kasya punaH sA vibhASA? RRtaH. yadyevam itve hi kRte na ayam RRkarAnto bhaviSyati? sthAnivadbhAvAd bhaviSyati. analvidhau sthAnivadbhAvaH, alvidhizcAyam? tasmAdanuvartayitavyam upadeze iti. tathA ca sati jAgaritaH, jAgaritavAnityatra api prApnoti, tadartham ekAcaH ityanuvartayitavyam. UrNotes tu vAcya UrNorNuvadbhAvo yaGprasiddhiH prayojanam. Amazca pratiSedhArtham ekAcazceDupagrahAt. prorNutaH. prorNutavAn.

sani graha-guhoz ca ONPANINI 72012
san (doesn't get iT after) grah, guh, (zri and uk-enders).mmmmmmmmm ^ M- C+ 749

So, even though bhU grah are seT, we get no iSan here --

bhU + san →sanyaGoH bhU + bhU + sa →hrasvaH bhu + bhU + sa →abhyAsecarca bu + bhU + sa →kric bubhUSa "want to be"

grah + san →rudavida grah + (k)sa →grahijyA gRh + sa →sanyaGoH gR + gRh + sa →urat ga + gRh + sa →kuhozcu ja + gRh + sa →sanyataH ji + gRh + sa →hoDhaH jigRDh + sa →ekAcoba jighRDhsa →SaDhoHkassi jighRkSa "want to grab"

As in --

jighRkSa + laT tip → jighRkSati "he wants to take"

See also exception iTsanivA below.

In that bubhUSa, why didn't we get ba like in babhUva?

That ba of babhUva comes from bhavateraH, which works only before liT, not before san.

kR;sR;bhR;vR;stu;dru;sru;zruvo liTi ONPANINI 72013
valAdi liT gets iT after all roots but kR sR bhR vR stu dru sru zru.mmmmmmmmm ^ C+ 750

Exception to ekAca::u, which would have made the roots get iT or not depending on whether they are seT or aniT.

Therefore: a valAdi liT gets no iT after kR sR bhR vR stu dru sru zru, even though some of those are seT --

kR + liT mas → kR + ma → cakR + ma → cakRma "we made"

zru + liT mas zuzruma "we heard"

and gets iT after all other roots, even the aniT roots like kSip --

kSip + liT mahi → cikSipimahe "we threw"

This rule has dozens of exceptions, most of which affect thal. So thal will get iT always after some roots, never after others, and optionally after others. eg, thal gets iT optionally after pac --

pac + liT thal → pac + thal papaktha "they say you cooked"

pac + liT thal → pac + ithal pecitha "they say you cooked"

Do not lose sleep trying to learn the iT rules of the liT. You'll seldom need to know them, because non-third person liT is VERY uncommon .

KAZIKA kR sR bhR vR stu dru sru zru ityeteSAM liTi pratyaye iDAgamo na bhavati. kR cakRva, cakRma. sR sasRva, sasRma. bhR babhRva, babhRma. vRJ vavRva, vavRma. vRG vavRvahe, vavRmahe. stu tuSTuva, tuSTuma. dru dudruva, dudruma. sru susruva, susruma. zru zuzruva, zuzruma. siddhe satyArambho niyamarthaH , krAdaya eva liTi aniTaH, tato 'nye seTaH iti. bibhidiva, bibhidima. luluviva, luluvima. anudAttopadezAnAm atra prakRtyAzrayaH pratiSedhaH, vRJvRGostu prtyayAzrayaH, tadubhayasya apyayaM niyamaH. vRJo hi thali vavartha iti nipAtanAd vyavasthA. studrusruzruvAM tu Rto bhAradvAjasya ityasmAdapi niyamAt ya iT prApnoti so 'pi neSyate. tuSTotha. dudrotha susrotha. zuzrotha. kRJo 'suTkasya iti vaktavyam. sasuTkasya iDagamo yathA syAt. saJcaskariva, saJcaskarima. Rto bhAradvAjasya ity etad apy asuTkasya eva iSyate, saJcaskaritha.

The original translates literally into " kR sR bhR vR stu dru sru zru before liT ", which appears to have at best a remote relationship with your translation. Justify yourself.

Adding the trickle, the rule says " liT gets no iT after kR sR bhR vR stu dru sru zru". This makes no sense if interpreted literally, because some of those roots wouldn't have gotten iT anyway. So, this must be a niyama rule, and we must understand 'ONLY' --

" liT gets no iT ONLY after kR sR bhR vR stu dru sru zru"

Which is the same thing as saying that liT gets iT after all the other roots, even if they are aniT roots. Whip yourself, for atonement.

zv';Idito niSThAyAm ONPANINI 72014
niSThA (don't get iT) after Idit roots or zvi.mmmmmmmmm ^ C+ 751

Exception to ArdhadhAtukasyeD.

Example with the seT roots zvi (Tuo~)zvi "swell" 01.1165 (a yaj-class root)

zvi + kta →oditazca zvi + kna →vacisvapi zu + na- →halaH zUna- "swelled, swollen (esp. morbidly), increased, grown"

Example with the seT root dIp dIp(I) "shine" 04.0045 --

dIp + kta → dIpta- "lighted up, shining"

KAZIKA zvayater Iditaz ca niSThAyAm iDAgamo na bhavati. zUnaH. zUnavAn. IditaH olajI lagnaH. lagnavAn. ovijI udvignaH. udvignavAn. oditazceti niSthAtakArasya nakAraH. dIpI dIptaH. dIptavAn. DIGastvoditAM madhye pATho jJApako niSThAyAm aniT-tvasya. sa hi natvArthaH, natvaM ca niSthAto 'nantarasya vidhIyate. uDDInaH. uDDInavAn. niSThAyAm ityadhikAraH ArdhadhAtukasyeDvalAdeH iti yAvat.

yasya vibhASA ONPANINI 72015
( niSThA doesn't get iT) after roots after which other affixes get iT optionally.mmmmmmmmm ^ C+ 752

Example --

(1) After the seT root dhU dhU(J) "shake" 09.0020, the affix tumun gets iT optionally (by svaratisUti).

(2) Therefore, kta and ktavatu do not get iT after dhu(J)

vidhUta- "was tossed about"

vidhUtavat- "he tossed about"

Small exception. After tan pat daridrA, the affix san gets iT optionally, by a vArttika to sanIvanta. Yet, this rule does not work on those three --

pat + kta →ArdhadhAtukasyeD patita "fallen"

KAZIKA yasya dhAtoH vibhASA kvacid iD-uktaH, tasya niSThAyAM parataH iD-Agamo na bhavati. vakSyati svaratisUtisUyatidhUJUdito vA. vidhUtaH. vidhUtavAn. guhU gUDhaH. gUDhavAn. udito vA vRdhu vRddhaH. vRddhavAn. tanipatidaridrANAm upasaGkhyAnam iti pater vibhASiteTkasya api dvitIyAzritAtItapatita 21024 ti nipAtanAtiDAgamaH.

kRcchra;gahanayoH kaSaH ONPANINI 72022
kaS (won't get iT before niSThA) when meaning painful or impenetrable.mmmmmmmmm ^ C+ 753

The root kaS 01.0781 "hurt" is seT, so kta should get iT after it. But because of this exception, there is no iT here --

kaSTaM vyAkaraNam "grammar is awfully hard"

kaSTAni vanAni "deep jungles"

Or in the curse --

kaSTam "argh!"

But in other senses, kaS gets iT as usual --

kaSitaM suvarNam "tested gold"

KAZIKA kRcchra gahana ityetayorarthayoH kaSer dhAtoH niSThAyAm iDAgamo na bhavati. kaSTo 'gniH. kaSTaM vyAkaraNam. tato 'pi kaSTatarANi sAmAni. kRcchraM duHkham, tatkAraNam apyagnyAdikaM kRcchram ityucyate. gahane kaSTAni vanAni. kaSTAH parvatAH. kRcchragahanayoH iti kim? kaSitaM suvarNam.

ArdhadhAtukasyeD val-AdeH ONPANINI 72035
valAdi soft gets iTmmmmmmmmm ^ M+ C+ 754

iT is a titaugment.

Therefore, the soft affixes tum(un) (k)ta (k)tvA sya, which start with the val letters t s, will be replaced with itum ita itva isya after most roots. Like this --

car + tumun car + ( iT + tumun ) → caritum "to move"

car + kta car + ( iT + kta) → carita- "moved"

car + ktvA car + ( iT + ktvA) → car + itvA → caritvA "moved and"

bhU + sya + tip bhU + ( iT + sya) + ti →kric bhU + iSya + ti →hardsoft bho + iSya + ti →ecoya bhaviSyati "will be"

See also exception ekAca::u.

graho 'liTi dIrghaH ONPANINI 72037
After grah, lengthen ( iT), unless in a liT.mmmmmmmmm ^ C+ 755

As in --

grah + kta →ArdhadhAtukasyeD grah + ita →grahijyA gRh + ita gRhIta- "taken"

grah + ktvA gRhItvA "grabbed and"

grah + tRc grahItR- "grabber"

grah + tumun grahItum "to take"

grah + tavya grahItavya- "should be taken"

The iT of liT affixes is unaffected --

grah + liT mas →ArdhadhAtukasyeD grah + ima jagRhima "we took"

Careful. This rule lengthens the normal iT from ArdhadhAtukasyeD, but not the ciNvadiT from syasicsIyu --

grah + karmaNi lRT ta → grah + sya + ta →syasicsIyu grah + isya + ta →Tita grahisyate →kric grahiSyate "it will be taken"

KAZIKA grahaH uttarasya iTaH aliTi dIrgho bhavati. grahItA. grahItum. grahItavyam. aliTi iti kim? jagRhiva. jagRhim. prakRtasyeTo dIrghatvamidam, ciNvadiTo na bhavati. grAhitA. hrAhiSyate.

v'-RRto vA ONPANINI 72038
(Lengthen iT) optionally after RR-enders, vRG and vRJ (unless in a liT).mmmmmmmmm ^ C+ 756

Addition to graho 'liTi dIrghaH above. The lenghtening that is compulsory after grah is optional after RR-enders, vRG, vRJ.

Examples with RR-enders --

tRR + tRc taritR- "crosser"

tRR + tRc taritR- tarItR- "crosser"

Examples with vRG vRJ --

varitR- "chooser"

varItR- "chooser"

As in

bhikSavo na varItAro varanti khalu grAhakAH

This won't work on liT affixes --

vavaritha

teritha

KAZIKA vR iti vRG-vRJoH sAmAnyena grahaNam. tasmAd uttarasya RRkAr%Antebhyaz ca iTo vA dIrgho bhavati. varitA, varItA. prAvaritA, prAvarItA. RRkArAntebhyaH taritA, tarItA. AstaritA, AstarItA. vRRtaH iti kim? karSyati. hariSyati. aliTi ity eva, vavaritha. teritha.

How did the vRRtas in the sUtra come to mean "after RR-enders, vRG and vRJ"?

vR is short for "vRG and vRJ",

RRt means RR by tapara,

Those two compound into vRRt (see akassa),

and Gasi means "after" by tasmAdi.

iT sani vA ONPANINI 72041
san gets iT optionally (after RR-enders and vR).mmmmmmmmm ^ C+ 757

Rule sanigraha says that san is ordinarily iT-less after all uk-enders. By this exception, iT is optional after all RR ender roots (such as tRR) and after the root vR.

When we choose to add iT, rule ikojhal can no longer work, so the iSan is not kit and triggers hardsoft --

tRR + san tRR + iSan →hardsoft tar + iSan →sanyaGo tatariSa →sanyataH titariSa "want to cross"

also, optional rule vRRtovA applies --

titariSa →vRRtovA titarISa "want to cross"

If we choose to not add iT we get --

tRR + san →ikojhal tRR + ksan →RRta::iddhAtoH tir + ksan →halica tIrsa →sanyaGoH titIrsa →kric titIrSa "want to cross"

So there are three options for tRR + san + laT tip --

titariSati "wants to cross"

titarISati "wants to cross"

titIrSati "wants to cross"

And three for vRR --

vivariSate

vivarISate

vuvUrSate

This rule has an exception: after kRR gRR, san gets iT compulsorily. See kirazca below.

KAZIKA vRRtasH sani vA iDAgamo bhavati. vuvUrSate, vivariSate, vivarISate. prAvuvUrSati, prAvivariSati, prAvivarISati. RRkArAntebhyaH titIrSati, titariSati, titarISati. AtistIrSate, AtistariSate, AtistarISate| sanigrahaguhozca 72012 iti iTpratiSedhe prApte pakSe iDAgamo vidhIyate. iTazca vRRtovA 72038 iti pakSe dIrghaH| cikIrSati, jihIrSati ity atra upadezAdhikArAt lAkSaNikatvAc ca iDAgamo na bhavati|

svarati;sUti; sUyati;dhUJ;Udito vA ONPANINI 72044
svR, sUti, sUyati, dhUJ, and the Udit are veT.mmmmmmmmm ^ C+ 758

These roots can make their valAdi affixes get iT --

dhU(J) + tA →ArdhadhAtukasyeD dhU + itA →hardsoft dho + itA →ecoya dhavitA "he will shake"

gup(U) + tum(un) →ArdhadhAtukasyeD gup + itum →puganta gopitum "to protect"

Or not --

dhU(J) + tA →hardsoft dhotA "he will shake"

gup(U) + tum(un) →puganta goptum "to protect"

The word Udit here means the roots that have U label in the dhAtupATha, such as gup(U) 01.0461 "hide, protect, rule".

See the kAzikA for more examples.

KAZIKA svarati sUti sUyati dhUJ ity etebhyaH, Udidbhyaz ca uttarasya valAderArdhadhAtukasya vA iDAgamo bhavati. svartA, svaritA. sUti prasotA, prasavitA. sUyati sotA, savitA. dhUJ dhotA, dhavitA. UdhidbhyaH khalvapi gAhU vigADhA, vigAhitA. gupU goptA, gopitA. vA iti vartamane punar vAgrahaNaM liGsicor nivRttyartham. sUtisUyatyor vikaraNanirdezaH SU preraNe ityasya nivRttyarthaH. dhUJiti sAnubandhakasya nirdeso dhU vidhUnane ityasay nivRtty arthaH. savitA, dhuvitA ityeva nityam etayor bhavati. svarateretasmAd vikalpAt RddhanoH sye ityetad bhavati vipratiSedhena. svariSyati. kiti tu pratyaye zryukaH kiti iti nityaH pratiSedho bhavati pUrvavipratiSedhena. svRtvA. sUtvA. dhUtvA.

san/Ivanta;rdha;bhrasja;dambhu;zri;svR;yUrNu;bhara;jJapi;sanAm ONPANINI 72049
san (gets iT optionally) after iv-enders, Rdhu-bhrasja, dambhu-zri-svR, yu-UrNu-bhR and jJapi-san.mmmmmmmmm ^ C+ 759

Examples --

yu + san yu + iSan →hardsoft yo + iSa →ecoya yaviSa →sanyaGoH yayaviSa →sanyataH yiyaviSa "want to yoke"

yu + san →ikojhal yu + sa(k) →ajjhana yU + sa →sanyaGoH yuyUsa →kric yuyUSa "want to yoke"

See dambha::icca for the examples dhipsati dhIpsati didambhiSati, and see the kAzikA for the other examples.

KAZIKA ivantAnAM dhAtUnAm, Rdhu bhrasja dambhu zri svR yu UrNu bhara jJapi san ity eteSAM ca sani vA iD-Agamo bhavati. ivantAnAm dideviSati, dudyUSati. siseviSati, susyUSati. Rdhu ardidhiSati, Irtsati. bhrasja bibhrajjiSati, bibhrakSati, bibharjjiSati, bibharkSati. dambhu didambhiSati, dhipsati, dhIpsati. zri ucchizrayiSati, ucchizrISati. svR sisvariSati, susvUrSati. yu yiyaviSati, yuyUSati. UrNu prorNunaviSati, prorNunaviSati, prorNunUSati. bhara iti bhRJityetasya bhauvAdikasya grahaNam, zapA nirdezAt. vibhariSati, bubhUrSati. jJapi jijJapayiSati, jJIpsaTi. san sisaniSati, siSAsati. kecidatra bharajJapisanitanipatidaridrANAm iti paThanti. tani titaniSati, titaMsati, titAMsati. pati pipatiSati, pitsati. daridrA didaridriSati, didaridrAsati. sani iti kim? devitA. bhraSTA.

aJceH pUjAyAm ONPANINI 72053
( ktvA kta ktavatu get iT) after aJcu that means 'honoring'.mmmmmmmmm ^ C+ 760

So, we get aJcitvA aJcita- aJcitavat(u)- compulsorily.

Example --

aJcu + kta aJcita- "was honored, whorshipped, hospitably received"

as in

aJcitA asya guravaH "his teachers were honored"

This is an exception to yasyavibhASA (that would make the iT optional on kta ktavatu) and to uditovA (that would forbid iT on ktvA).

When the root aJcu does not mean "to honor", this rule won't work. As in ud + aJcu "draw up" --

ud + aJcu + kta udakta- "was drawn up"

as in

udaktam udakaGM kUpAt "water was drawn up from the well"

This rule sounds a lot like n' .AJceH pUjAyAm, so be careful.

KAZIKA aJceH pUjAyAm arthe ktvA-niSThayoH iDAgamo bhavati. aJcitvA jAnu juhoti. aJcitA asya guravaH. udito veti ktvA-pratyaye vikalpaH prAptaH, niSThAyAm yasya vibhASeti pratiSedhaH prAptaH, tadartham idaM prArabdham. pUjAyAm iti kim? udaktam udakaM kUpAt. uddhRtam ity arthaH.

Mnemonic --

adbhiH kUpAd udaktAbhir asmAbhir guravo 'JcitAH "and we drew water from the well and honored our gurus with it"

udito vA ONPANINI 72056
After udit root ( ktvA gets iT) optionallymmmmmmmmm ^ C+ 761

After a root that is udit in the dhAtupATha, ktvA can get iT or not.

Example: the seT root tam means to wish, and it is listed as tam tam(u) in 04.0099. So we can say either --

tam(u) + ktvA →ArdhadhAtukasyeD tamitvA "after wishing"

, or --

tam(u) + ktvA tamtvA →nazcA taMtvA →anusvA tantvA "got tired and"

where this rule prevented ArdhadhAtukasyeD.

KAZIKA udito dhAtoH ktvA-pratyaye parato vA iD-Agamo bhavati. zamu zamitvA, zAntvA. tamu tamitvA, tAntvA. damu damitvA, dAntvA.

acas tAsvat thaly aniTo nityam ONPANINI 72061
After a vowel, thal won't get iT if tAs never gets iT.mmmmmmmmm ^ C+ 762

BEGINNERS BEWARE -- you do not need to learn any of the thal rules until next year, because they are needed once in a blue moon.

This is an exception to kR;sR;bhR;vR;stu;dru;sru;zru, that makes thal get iT after most roots.

Examples. Root nI ends in a vowel never makes tAs get iT (we say netA for "he shal lead, never nayitA). Therefore, thal doesn't get iT after nI, even though kRsR says it should --

nI + liT sip → nI + thal →hardsoft ne + tha →liTidhA ne + ne + tha →hrasvaH ninetha "thou led"

Because of RtobhAradvAjasya below, this rule is optional if the root does not end in R. So we can still say --

nI + liT sip → nI + thal →kRsR nI + ithal →hardsoft ne + itha →liTidhA ne + ne + itha →hrasvaH ni + ne + itha →ecoya ni + nay + itha → ninayitha "thou led"

When the root ends in R this rule is compulsory --

sasmartha "you remembered"

KAZIKA tAsau ye nityAniTo dhAtavaH ajantAH, tebhyastAsAviva thali iDAgamo na bhavati. yAtA yayAtha. cetA cicetha. netA ninetha. hotA juhotha. acaH iti kim? bhettA bibheditha. tAsvatiti kim? lUtvA lulavitha. thali iti kim? yAtA yayiva. yayima. aniDgrahaNaM nityam ityanena vizeSaNArtham. nityagrahaNaM kim? vidhotA, vidhavitA vidudhavitha. tAsi vibhASiteT, thali nityam iDAgamo bhavati. tAsvatiti vatinirdezaH kimarthaH? tAsau tatasthali pratiSedhArthaH. yo hi tAsAvasan, asattvAc ca nityAniT, tasya thali pratiSedho na bhavati. jaghasitha. uvayitha. uttarasUtre 'pi tAsvaditi vartate. adAdezo hi ghasiH, veJAdezazca vayistAsau na asti.

upadeze 'tvataH ONPANINI 72062
( thal gets no iT) after a root that has a in the dhAtupATha (and never makes tAs get iT).mmmmmmmmm ^ C+ 763

Example. pac has a inside, and its luT is paktAsmi "I shall cook". So, this rule allows thal to not be affected by kRsR --

pac + liT sip → pac + thal →liTidhA papac + tha →coHkuH papaktha "thou cooked"

Because of RtobhAradvAjasya below, this rule is always optional. So we can still make kRsR work --

pac + liT sip → pac + thal →kRsR pac + ithal →liTidhA papac + itha →thalicaseTi pecitha "thou cooked"

The root has to have a in its dhAtupATha form. So, this rule will not work on kRS when puganta makes it into karS --

kRS + liT sip → kRs + thal →kRsR kRS + ithal cakarSitha "thou pulled"

KAZIKA upadeze yo dhAturakAravAn tAsau nityAniT tasmAt tAsAviva thali iDAgamo na bhavati. paktA papaktha. yaSTA iyaSTha. zaktA zazaktha. upadeze iti kim? karSTA cakarSitha. atvataH iti kim? bhettA vibheditha. taparakaraNaM kim? rAddhA rarAdhitha. tAsvatityeva, jighRkSati. jagrahitha. nityam aniTaH ityeva, aGktA, aJjitA AnaJjitha.

Rto bhAradvAjasya ONPANINI 72063
The two previous rules are optional after non-R.mmmmmmmmm ^ C+ 764

See the two previous rules, acastAsvat and upadezetvataH, for examples.

KAZIKA RkArAntAd ghAtoH bhAradvAjasya acAryasya matena tAsAviva nityAniTasthali iDAgamo na bhavati. smartA sasmartha. dhvartA dadhvartha. siddhe satyArambho niyamArthaH, Rta eva bhAradvAjasya, nAnyeSAM dhAtUnAm. yayitha. vavitha. pecitha. zekitha. tadayam arthAt pUrvayoH yogayorvikalpaH. taparakaraNam RkArAntasya nivRttyartham. tathA hi sati vidhyartham etat syAt.

Rd;dhanoH sye ONPANINI 72070
sya (gets iT) after R-enders and han.mmmmmmmmm ^ C+ 765

Example after R-ender --

kR + lRT tip → kR + sya + ti →hardsoft kar + sya + ti kariSyati "he will make"

Example after han --

han + lRT mip → han + sya + mi han + iSya + mi →atodIrghoyaJi haniSyAmi "I will kill"

KAZIKA RkArAntAnAM dhAtUnAM hantezca sye iDAgamo bhavati. kariSyati. hariSyati. hanisyati. svarater veTtvAtRddhanoH sye ityetad bhavati vipratiSedhena. svariSyati. taparakaraNaM vispaSTArtham.

yama;rama;nam;AtAM sak ca ONPANINI 72073
yam ram nam, and A-enders, get sak (before flat luG, and the sic gets iT).mmmmmmmmm ^ C+ 766

Verbs with s(ak) + iSic are called " sis-aorist" or "six-aorist" ("aor [6]" in inria, see aorist types ). They are just an iSic aorist that adds s after the root.

Examples with nam and with yA, an A-ender root --

nam + luG jhi anam + iSic + us anams + iS + us →nazcA anaMsiSus "they bowed"

yA + luG jhi yAs + iSic + jhi ayAsiSus "they went"

As always, iTa::ITi works before It''' Is''' --

nam + luG tip anams + iS + It''' →iTa::ITi anams + It → anaMsIt "he bowed"

yA + luG sip ayAs + iS + Is''' →iTa::ITi ayAs + Is → ayAsIs "you went"

KAZIKA yama rama nama ityeSAm aGgAnAm AkArAntAnAM ca sagAgamo bhavati parasmaipade sici, iDAgamazca. yam ayaMsIt, ayaMsiSTAm ayaMsiSTAM, ayaMsiSuH. ram araMsIt, araMsiSTAm, araMsiSuH. nam anaMsIt, anaMsiSTAm anaMsiSuH. akArAntAnAm ayAsIt, ayAsiSTAm, ayAsiSuH. yamAdInAM halantalakSaNA vRddhiH prAptA sA neTi pratiSidhyate. parasmaipadeSu ityeva, ayaMsta. araMsta. anaMsta.

kirazca paJcabhyaH ONPANINI 72075
( san gets iT) after kRR gRR dRG dhRG praccH.mmmmmmmmm ^ C+ 767

All examples --

kRR + san + laT tip kR + iSan + ti cikariSati "wants to scatter"

gRR → jigariSati

dRG → didariSate

dhRG → didhariSate

praccH → pipracchiSati

Wait. Wouldn't kRR gRR have gotten iT anyway from iTsanivA?

No. That rule allows the options titIrSati, titariSati, and titarISati. This rule pulls kRR gRR out of the jurisdiction of that rule, so that only cikariSati is allowed, but not cikarSati or cikarISati.

rudAdibhyaH sArvadhAtuke ONPANINI 72076
( val) hard (gets iT) after rud svap zvas prAN jakS.mmmmmmmmm ^ M- C+ 768

These are lukclass roots.

rud + tip rud + ( tip + iT ) →Adyantau rud + itip →puganta roditi "wails"

svap + tip svap + itip → svapiti "sleeps"

zvasiti "breathes, pants, hisses"

prANiti "breathes"

jakSiti "eats"

KAZIKA rudAdibhyaH uttarasya valAdeH sArvadhAtukasya iDAgamo bhavati. rud roditi. svap svapiti. zvas zvasiti. an prANiti. jakS jakSiti. paJcabhyaH ityeva, jAgarti. sArvadhAtuke iti kim? svaptA. valAdeH ity eva, rudanti.

Why do we say " hard " ?

No iT for a soft --

svap + tRc → svaptR- "sleeper"

Why " val " ?

No iT for a yac hard --

rud + jhi → rud + anti''' → rudanti "they cry"

svap + jhi → svap + anti''' → svapanti "they sleep"

liGaH sa-lopo 'n-antyasya ONPANINI 72079
hard liG loses nonfinal s.mmmmmmmmm ^ M- C+ 769

Example with flat --

dviS + @hard liG t''' →yAsuTpa dviS + yAst dviS + yAt''' → dviSyAt "he'd hate"

Example with flat tip after a --

bhU + @hard liG t''' →kartarizap bhava + t''' →yAsuTpa bhava + yAst →atoyeyaH bhava + iyst bhava + iyt →lopovyo bhava + it →AdguNaH bhavet "he'd be"

Examples with bent ta --

dviS + @hard liG ta →liGassI dviS + sIyta dviS + Iyta →lopovyo dviSIta "he'd hate"

plu + @hard liG ta → plava + ta →liGassI plava + sIyta plava + Iyta →AdguNaH plaveyta →lopovyo plaveta "he'd jump"

Back to hard bent liG rules .

ato yeyaH ONPANINI 72080
After a, yA (of hard yAsuT) to iy.mmmmmmmmm ^ M- C+ 770

Rules yAsuTpa and liGassa teach that when the flat tiG affixes replace hard liG, they get yA added in front. So, after zRNu --

zRNu + @hard liG tip →itazca zRNu + t →yAsuTpa zRNu + yAt''' → zRNuyAt "he'd hear"

zRNu + @hard liG mip →tasthastha zRNu + am →yAsuTpa zRNu + yAm''' → zRNuyAm "I'd hear"

zRNu + @hard liG jhi →jherjus zRNu + us →yAsuTpa zRNu + yus''' → zRNuyus "they'd hear"

This exception, "yA to iy after a", says that after what ends in a (like paca, kSipa, cintaya), the affixes get iy in front, not the usual yA --

paca + t paca + iyt →AdguNaH pacet "he'd cook"

paca + am paca + iyam →AdguNaH paceyam "I'd cook"

paca + us paca + iyus →AdguNaH paceyus "they'd cook"

KAZIKA akArAntAtaGgAduttarasya yA ity etasya sArvadhAtukasya iy ity ayam Adezo bhavati, pacet, pacetAm, paceyuH iti. atra usy apadAntAd iti pararUpaM bAdhitam. ataH iti kim? cinuyAt. sunuyAt. taparakaraNam kim? yAyAt. sArvadhAtuka ityeva, cikIrSyAt. nanu ca ato lopa ity anenAtra bhavitavyam, pacetityatra api hi tarhi ato dIrgho yaJIti dIrghatvena bhavitavyam, tadanena avazyaM vidhyantaraM bAdhitavyam, sa yathaiva dIrghasya bAdhakaH evam ato lopasya api bAdhakaH syAt? syAdetadevaM yadi dIrghaH sArvadhAtuke vidhIyate. atha tu tiGi vidhIyate, tadA yena nAprAptinyAyena dIrghasyaiva bAdhakaH syAn na punarato lopasya. yeyaH ityavibhaktiko nirdezaH. yaH iti vA SaSThInirdeze yalopasya asiddhatvamanAzritya AdguNaH kRtaH, sautratvAn nirdezasya iti. kecitatra ato yAsiyaH iti sUtraM pathanti. teSAM sakArAntaH sthAnI, SaSThIsamAsazca.

paca plus iyt makes paceyt. But you wrote pacet. How come the y disappeared?

Ooopsie sorry. I forgot to mention lopovyo there.

How did yA plus us made yus in zRNuyus above?

See yus'''.

What do the other six hard flat liG turn into?

Please see hard flat liG after a .

Ato GitaH ONPANINI 72081
Merge a with the A of AtAm AthAm into e.mmmmmmmmm ^ M+ C+ 771

Example --

vand + zap + laG AthAm →luGlaG avanda + AthAm avandethAm "both of you praised"

Will this work with Ate''' Athe'''?

Sure will --

plu + zap + laT AtAm → plava + AtAm →Tita plava + Ate''' plavete "both jump"

dRz + yak + laT AthAm →Tita dRzya + Athe''' dRzyethe "you two are being seen"

It turns out that Atas + GitaH literally translates, adding trickles, to "(after a,) replace A of Git with (iy)". How did that end up meaning "merge a with the A of AtAm AthAm into e"?

Yuu figure that one out. As an exercise.

Ane muk ONPANINI 72082
(a-enders) get muk before zAnac kAnac.mmmmmmmmm ^ M- C+ 772

Examples with plava, krama-, hanya-, yotsya- getting m after their a --

plu + zAnac → plava + zAnac plavam- + Ana → plavamAna- "that jump"

kram + zap + zAnac → krama + Ana kramamAna- →Natvam kramamANa- "that advances by steps"

han + yak + zAnac hanyamAna- "that is being attacked"

yudh + lRT →lRTassadvA yudh + zAnac → yudh + sya + Ana →puganta yodh + sya + Ana →kharica yot + sya + Ana yotsyamAna- "that is going to fight"

Counterexamples. No m after non-a --

dviS + zAnac → dviSAna →Natvam dviSANa- "that hates"

hu + zAnac → juhu + Ana →huznuvossA juhvAna- "that sacrifices"

zIG + zAnac →zIGassArvadhAtukeguNaH ze + Ana →ecoya zayAna- "that sleeps"

bhuj + znam + zAnac → bhunj + Ana →nazcA bhuMjAna →anusvA bhuJjAna- "that eats"

What's kAnac?

Optional vedic replacement of liT. NVM it.

Id AsaH ONPANINI 72083
( zAnac) to I after As.mmmmmmmmm ^ M- C+ 773

Only example --

As + zAnac As + Ina → AsIna- "that sits"

As in --

gaur AsInaH "Sitting Bull"

You made up that example.

I did. So what? You'll remember it.

How'd you say "sitting cow"?

The zAnac feminines always get Ap by ajAdya, so that's gaur AsInA

And "holy cow"?

gauH. All cows are holy. You heathen!

aSTana:: A vibhaktau ONPANINI 72084
Optionally aSTan- to A before vibhakti.mmmmmmmmm ^ C+ 774

Examples --

aSTan- + sup' aSTaA + su →akassa aSTAsu "in eight"

aSTan- + jas aSTaA- + jas →akassa aSTA- + jas →aSTAbhya::auz aSTA- + au →vRddhireci aSTau "eight"

If we don't take this option, aSTan- works just like paJcan- --

aSTan- + sup' →nalopaHprA aSTasu

aSTan- + jas →SaDbhyoluk aSTan

KAZIKA aSTano vibhaktau parataH AkArAdezo bhavati. aSTAbhiH. aSTAbhyaH. aSTAnAm. aSTAsu. vibhaktau iti kim? aSTatvam. aSTatA. A iti vyaktinirdezo 'yam. AkRtinirdeze tu nakArasthane 'nunAsikAkAraH syAt. vikalpena ayam AkAro bhavati, etaj jJApitam aSTano dIrghAd iti dIrghagrahaNAt, aSTAbhya auz iti ca kRtAtvasya nirdezAt. tena aSTabhiH, aSTabhyaH ityapi bhavati. tadantavidhizca atra iSyate. priyAH aSTau yeSAm te priyASTAnaH. priyASTau.

rAyo hali ONPANINI 72085
rai- to (A) before consonant ( vibhakti).mmmmmmmmm ^ M- C+ 775

As in --

rai- + su rAs "riches"

rai- + bhis rAbhis "with riches"

This rule works only on rai-, which is the only commonly used nounbase that ends in ai. So, if you make up other nounbases that end in ai, such as jedai-, this rule won't work on them --

na vareNyAni jedaibhisH sAhasAny unmadAdayaH

"excitements, adventures... such things Jedi knights must not crave"

KAZIKA rai ityetasya halAdau vibhaktau parataH AkArAdezo bhavati. rAbhyAm. rAbhiH. hali iti kim? rAyau. rAyaH. vibhaktau iti kim? raitvam. raitA. mRjer vRddhiH ity ataH prAg vibhaktyadhikAraH.

yuSmad;asmador an-Adeze ONPANINI 72086
yuSmad- asmad- to (A before a consonant sup) that is not a replacement.mmmmmmmmm ^ C+ 776

After after yuSmad- asmad-, rules yuSmad;asmadbhyAMGasoz ff replace most consonant sup with az am ns abhyam at Aka, and leave only bhyAm, bhis and sup' unreplaced. So this rule replaces those three.

All examples --

yuSmad- + bhyAm →yuvAvaudvivacane yuva + bhyAm yuvA + bhyAm → yuvAbhyAm "with the two of you"

asmad- + bhyAm avAbhyAm "with the two of us"

yuSmad- + bhis yuSma + A + bhis →akassa yuSmAbhis "with y'all"

asmAbhis "with us"

yuSmAsu "about y'all"

asmAsu "about us"

What happens to the sup that start with a vowel?

See yo 'ci below.

Back to yuSmad- asmad- tables .

KAZIKA yuSmad asmad ity etayoH an-Adeze vibhaktau parataH AkAr'-Adezo bhavati. yuSmAbhiH. asmAbhiH. yuSmAsu. asmAsu. anAdeze iti kim? yuSmat. asmat. hali ity adhikArAd apy atra na syAt. uttaratra tu an-Adeza-grahaNena prayojanam yo 'cIti, tad ihaiva kriyate.