chunk 32: 63091 lengthening rules chunk 32: 63091 lengthening rules
63091 Pronoun to
63097
63106 optionally before
63111 Lengthen
63112
63137 Sometimes other lengthenings are seen.
63138 before
64001 Replace stem.
64002 after consonant.
64003 before
64004 but not
64006
64007 Nexttolast of
64008 before strong that is not the calling.
64010 of
64011 of
64012 Rule
64013 Before
64014 Non-rootnoun
64015 of nasal-enders before
64016
^ 
Examples --
tad- + 
^ 
This rule may be reworded into "the
Examples with dvi-,
Rule Ap;jJapy;RdhAm It is sort of like this one; it makes
^ 
Only example --
If the ku means ISad, then replacing with
^ 
Example when rori deletes
Example when DhoDhelopaH deletes
See also long before r .
^ Examples of
Example of
ud + vah + luG tas
^ 
More than a "rule", this is an excuse. This says that in some cases we are going to hear words that have a long vowel where, according to grammar rules, a short belongs, but that they can be considered correct nonetheless if the Big Schtrumpfs agree that they are correct.
Example. In this line ( BHG 6:36) --
The word
^ This
Examples --
prati +
^ headline. The following rules, down to 81001 sarvasyadve exclusive, replace only the stem of affixes when those affixes are added.
Example.
Rule nAmi teaches: " lengthen the short that is before
However, because of this headline, this does not mean that every short is lengthened before every
Therefore, rule nAmi will lengthen the
But it will not lengthen the
because those
^ After stretching roots like
Examples --
hUta- "called"
( Not same as
so we say
^ 
Examples --
See exception natisRcatasR right below.
^ Exception to nAmi.
tri- f + Am →
^ 
Only example --
If we don't take the option --
^ There are exactly five examples --
^ I nicknamed this rule as the " rAjAnam rule", after the first example below. That's way better than calling it "
Examples with
rAjA "king"
Examples with vowel-ender nounbases that got
phalAni "fruits, results"
^ Lengthen last vowel of
Examples. mahat- "big" and
Before zi, neuter
^ Example after ap- --
After a tRc-ender --
After
Counterexample before a weak --
Counterexample before strong calling --
as in --
^ So the
The rootnoun han- is unaffected too --
This rule literally says
"
The next rule, sauca, translates as "and before su". Therefore, the two rules together state:
"
Now, the true meaning of this must be
"But
because without the "only", this rule would be useless. (See niyama for more examples of skipped "only".)
^ I translated this rule and the previous rule ( inhan) together. See examples there.
^ The
This rule affects all
This rule won't work when the su is not strong --
Also won't work when the at-ender is not udit. For instance,
and
^ Examples before kta, ktin, that are serious kit --
Example before kvip, one of the
pra +
This
This rule won't work before ktic, because of exception naktici way below.
^ 
Examples with vowelender roots plu zru
plu + san puplUSa "want to jump"
zru + san zuzrUSa "want to hear"
mumUrSa "want to die, be about to die"
Example with han --
Example with gam (that's the
adhi + iG + san + laT ta →
Even though
chunk 32: 63091 lengthening rules