71078
71079 But optionally before
71080 After "
71081 Compulsorily if there is
71082
71084
71085
71086
71087
71088 Tail of wimpy to
71089
71090
71091 First person
71092 Non-calling after
71093 to
71094 Replace
71095
71096 When feminine too.
71097 Optionally before vowel
71098
71100
71101 nexttolast
71102
72001
72002
72003
72004 But not before
72007 Light
(Exception to ugidacA, that would otherwise
Example with a stammered from jakSi --
Example with a stammered made by zlu --
As in --
This masculine
As in --
See also exception vAnapuMsakasya right below.
See also
KAZIKA abhyastAd aGgAd uttarasya zatuH num na bhavati. dadat, dadatau, dadataH. dadhat, dadhau, dadhataH. jakSat, jakSatau, jakSataH. jAgrat, jAgratau, jAgrataH. zatur anantara I-kAro na vihitaH iti vyavahitasya api numaH pratiSedho vijJAyate.
After stammered, zatR gets num optionally before zi, in spite of nAbhyastAcchatuH that would forbid num.
Examples --
Careful. In inria, these are the blue green
See also
As GI and zI are not strong, usually they would not cause zatR to get num. Yet this rule says that they get num optionally.
Yet, because of exceptions ( zapzyanornityam, nAbhyastAcchatuH), in fact we only get this optionality after za, after the sya made by lRTassa, and after the lukclass roots that end in
Examples after za --
before GI --
before zI --
Example after sya --
Example after
If we don't use this rule, we get the same forms without the num --
Back to
KAZIKA avarNAntAd aGgAd uttarasya zatuH vA numAgamo bhavati zInadyoH parataH. tudatI kule, tudantI kule. tudatI brAhmaNI, tudantI brAhmaNI. yAtI kule, yAntI kule. yAtI brAhmaNI, yAntI brAhmaNI. kariSyatI kule, kariSyantI kule. kariSyatI brAhmaNI, kariSyantI brAhnaNI. atra antaraGgatvAdekAdeze kRte vyapavargAbhAvAtavarNAntA daGgAduttarasya zatuH iti na yujyate vaktum, ubhayata Azraye nAntadivatityantAdivadbhAvo 'pi nAsti, bhUtapUrvagatyAzrayaNe vA adatI, ghnatI ityevam AdiSu atiprasaGgaH iti? atra samAdhiM kecidAhuH. zaturavayave zatRzabdo vartate avarNAntAdaGgAduttaro yaH zatravayavaH iti. apare punarAhuH. At ity anena zInadyAveva vizeSyete. avarNAntAd aGgAd uttare ye zInadyau tayoH parataH zatrantasya num bhavati iti. tatra yena nAvyavadhAnaM tena vyavahite 'pi vacanaprAmANyAtiti takAreNa eva vyavadhAnam AzrayiSyate. At iti kim? kurvatI. sunvatI. zInadyoH iti kim? tudatAm. nudatAm.
Notice that
Exception to the previous rule, AcchI. When there is zap or zyan before the zatR that is before zI GI, then the num is compulsory.
Examples with GI after a feminine --
Examples with zI after a neuter --
So num is compulsory after most roots, because the roots that get zap zyan before zatR make up about 80 percent of all roots -- all the zapclass, zyanclass, nichclass and causative roots.
See also
KAZIKA zap zyanityetayoH zatuH zInadyoH parato nityaM numAgamo bhavati. pacantI kule. pacantI brAhmaNI. dIvyantI kule. dIvyantI brAhmaNI. sIvyantI kule. sivyantI brAhnaNI. nityagrahaNam vA ityasya adhikArasya nivRttyartham. ihArambhasAmarthyAn nityam uttaratra vikalpa eva azaGkyeta.
The word
Only example --
By a vArttika, this rule won't work when
and without it --
Only example --
div- f + su
The su may be the normal su or the calling su. So, please address the sky or its goddess this way --
Notice that divaWt has a tapara after
This rule affects the div- nounbase that means "sky", but not the root
See also diva::ut.
KAZIKA div ity etasya sau parataH aud ity ayam Adezo bhavati. dyauH. div iti prAtipadikam asti nir-anubandha-kam. dhAtus tu s%Anubandha-kaH, sa iha na gRhyate, akSadyUH.
There are exactly three examples:
pathin-
This
Back to pathin-.
KAZIKA pathin-mathinn-RbhukSinn-ity eteSAm aGgAnAM sau parataH AkAraH Adezo bhavati. panthAH. anthAH. RbhukSAH. sthAniny anunAsike 'pi AkAro 'nunAsiko na bhavati. bhAvyam anena savarNAnAM grahaNaM na bhavati iti zuddho hyayam ucvAryate.
Examples --
pathin- + au →
Back to pathin-.
Example --
Back to pathin-.
KAZIKA pathimathoH thakArasya sthAne 'nthaH ity ayam Adezo bhavati sarvanAmasthAne parataH. panthAH, panthAnau, panthAnaH. manthAH, manthAnau, manthAnaH.
Examples --
Back to pathin-.
KAZIKA pathyAdInAM bhasaMjJakAnAM TeH lopo bhavati. pathaH. pathA. pathe. mathaH. mathA. mathe. RbhukSaH. RbhukSA. RbhukSe. sarvanAmasthAne ityanuvartamAnam api virodhAdiha na sambadhyate.
The nounbase pums- means "man" or "male". This rule makes it get
(here naGisa kept nalopaHprA from erasing the
See also pums-.
KAZIKA puMsa ityetasya sarvanAmasthAne parato 'suGityayam Adezo bhavati. pumAn, pumAMsau, pumAMsaH. iha paramapumAniti prAgeva vibhaktyutpatteH samAsAntodAttatvam, utpannAyAM vibhaktau asuJityaniSTaH svaraH prApnoti? tadartham asuGi upadezivadvacanaM kartavyam. tena paramapumAnityantodAtto bhavati. pumAnityayaM punarAdyudAtta eva.
There are just three examples, su, au and jas --
go- + su
This rule does not work before am (exception automzasoH).
This rule will not work on the go- that was replaced with
Ther rule does work on the nounbase
KAZIKA gozadAt paraM sarvanAmasthAnaM Nit bhavati. NitkAryaM tatra bhavati ityarthaH. gauH, gAvau, gAvaH. taparakaraNaM kim? citraguH. zabalaguH. kathaM he citrago, he zabalagava iti? aGgavRtte punarvRttAvavidhirniSThitasya iti sambuddhijasorgune kRte NittvaM na bhavati. atha vA gotaH iti sambadhalakSaNA SaSThI, gotaH sambandhi yat sarvanAmasthAnam iti. yac ca tadarthasyaikatvAdiSu sarvanAmasthAnaM tad goH sarvanAmasthAnam ityucyate. citraguzabdAt tu sarvanAmasthAnaM tadanyapadArthasaikatvAdinAha. taparakaraNaM tu nirdezartham eva. kecitoto Nititi paThanti, dyozabdAdapi yat sarvanAmasthAnaM vidyate tadartham. dyauH, dyAvau, dyAvaH. gotaH ityetadeva taparakaraNanirdezAtokArAntopalakSaNaM draSTavyam. varNanirdezeSu hi taparakaraNaM prasiddham.
By parasmaipadAnANNal;a, both tip and mip turn into Nal. This label
This exception says we may erase the
Summarizing --
"he cooked" is always
"I cooked" may be
KAZIKA uttamo Nal vA Nit bhavati. NitkAryaM tatra vA bhavati ityarthaH. ahaM cakara, ahaM cakAra. ahaM papaca, ahaM papAca.
Because of rule acoJNiti, saying that "the affix is Nit" is just a short way of saying "we replace
All examples --
sakhi- + au
sakhi- + jas →
sakhi- + am →
KAZIKA asambuddhau yaH sakhizabdaH tasmAt paraM sarvanAmasthAnaM Nit bhavati. sakhAyau. sakhAyaH. asambuddhau iti kim? he sakhe.
There is no
sakhi- m +
This rule won't work on the non- calling strong su, because of exception anaGsau right below.
When sakhi- becomes neuter, which only happens at the end of a tatpuruSa compound, this rule will not work, because rAjAhas;sakhibhyaSTac is stronger.
This "to
The feminine of sakhi- gets GI and works normally --
KAZIKA sakhizabdasya sau parataH anaGityayam Adezo bhavati, sa cet suzabdaH sambuddhiH na bhavati. sakhA. asambuddhau iti kim? he sakhe.
With the calling, the ordinary rules work --
We can split this rule into two pieces --
(1) The final
(Rule Rnne did not work here because
(2) The
KAZIKA RkArAntAnAm aGgAnAm uzanas purudaMsasanehasityeteSAm ca asambuddhau sau parataH anaGAdezo bhavati. kartA. hartA. mAtA. pitA. bhrAtA. uzanA. urudaMsA. anehA. asambuddhau ityeva, he kartaH. he mAtaH. he pitaH. he purudaMsaH. he anehaH. he uzanaH. uzanasaH sambuddhau api pakSe anaGiSyate. he uzanan. na Gi-sambuddhyor iti nalopapratiSedho 'pi pakSe iSyate. he uzana. tathA coktam sambodhane tUzanastrirUpaM sAntaM tathA nAntamathApyadantam. mAdhyandinirvaSTi guNaM tvigante napuMsake vyAghrapadAm variSThaH. iti. taparakaraNamasandehArtham.
Before the calling, this rule does not work, so we get
This rule does not work on neuters because svamorna overrides it --
I have no idea if we should say
The nounbase
All examples --
But before a weak there is no
nor before the calling --
The feminine is always
KAZIKA kroSTuzabdaH tunpratyayAntaH saMjJAzabdaH sarvanAmasthAne 'sambuddhau parataH tRjvad bhavati. tRjantasya yad rUpaM tadasya bhavati ityarthaH. rUpAtidezo 'yam. prayAsattezca kruzereva Rjantasya ya rUpaM tadatidizyate. tac ca kroStR ityetadantodAttam. kroSTA, kroSTArau, kroSTAraH. kroSTAram, kroSTarau. sarvanAmasthAne ityeva, kroSTUn. asambuddhau ityeva, he kroSTo.
When
KAZIKA asarvanAmasthAnArtham ArambhaH. striyAM ca kroStuzabdasya tRjvad bhavati. kroSTrI. kroSTrIbhyAm. kroSTrIbhiH. kroSTuzabdaM kecid gaurAdiSu paThanti, te GISi pratyaye tRjvad-bhAvaM kurvanti. teSAM paJcabhiH kroSTrIbhiH krItaiH paJcakroSTRbhI rathaiH iti strIzabdasya luki kRte na sidhyati, tatra pratividheyam. ye tu gaurAdiSu na paThanti, teSAM striyAm ity artha-nirdezaH, striyAM vartamAnaH kroSTuzabdaH tRjvad bhavati. kRte 'tideze Rnnebhyo GIp iti GIp-pratyayaH. tatra udAttayaNo halpUrvAt 61174 ity ant%odAtta eva kroSTrI-zabdo bhavati.
Rule tRjvatkroSTuH usually works only before strong. But this exception says that the change into
we may also say
There is no such option before zas --
nor before the TAsup that start with a consonant --
KAZIKA tRtIyAdiSu vibhaktiSu ajAdiSu kroSTurvibhASA tRjvad bhavati. kroSTrA, kroSTunA. kroSTre kroSTave. kroSTuH, kroSToH. kroSTari, kroSTau. kroSTroH, kroSTvoH. tRtIyAdiSu iti kim? kroSTUn. aci iti kim? kroSTubhyAm. kroSTubhiH. tRjvadbhAvAt pUrvavipratiSedhena numnuTau bhavataH. priyakroSTune araNyAya. hitakroSTune vRSalakulAya. nuT kroSTUnAm.
vArttika -- the num augment from ikocivibhaktau stops this rule from working --
As in --
and so does the nuT from hrasva;nady;AponuT --
so we cannot say
This
catur- m + jas
anaDuh- m + jas
For anaDuh- f, see sAv anaDuhaH.
KAZIKA caturanaDuH iyetayoH sarvanAmasthAne parataH Am Agamo bhavati, sa codAttaH. catvAraH. anaDvAn, anaDvAhau, anaDvAhaH. anaDvAham. tadantavidhiratra iSyate. priyacatvAH, priyacatvArau, priyacatvAraH. priyAnaDvAn, priyAnDvAhau, priyAnaDvAhaH. anaDuhaH striyAm veti vaktavyam. anaDuhI, anaDvAhI. gaurAdipAThAt siddham.
The
Roots with
Examples --
When the root is before a consonant affix, rule halica will lengthen the
vi +
Notice that this rule is weaker than hardsoft --
See also upadhAyAz ca and ud oSThya-pUrvasya below.
KAZIKA RRkAr%Antasya dhAtoH aGgasya ikAr'-Adezo bhavati. kirati. girati. AstIrNam. vizIrNam. dhAtoH iti kim? pitRRNAm . mAtRRNAm . lAkSaNikasya apy atra grahaNam iSyate. cikIrSati ity atrApi yathA syAd iti dhAtu-grahaNaM kriyate.
Note. The abovementioned root
The roots with
This rule will change a nexttolast
See also exceptions udoSThya and urRt.
KAZIKA upadhAyAzca RRkArasya ikArAdezo bhavati. kIrtayati, kIrtayataH, kIrtayanti.
Exception to qta::iddhAtoH and upadhAyAzca, that would have made
The labials are six: the five pu, and
Example with
KAZIKA oSThya pUrvo yasmAd RRkArAtd asau oSThya-pUrvaH, tadantasya dhAtor aGgasya ukAr'-Adezo bhavati. pUrtAH piNDAH. pupUrSati. mumUrSati. susvUrSati. dantyoSThya-pUrvo 'py oSThya pUrvo bhavati ity atra api bhavati, vuvUrSati Rtvijam, prAvuvUrSati kambalam. oSThyo hyatra pratyAsatteraGgAvayava eva gRhyate, tena RR gatau ityasya sampUrvasya samIrNam iti bhavati. ittvottvAbhyAM guNa-vRddhI bhavato vipratiSedhena. AstaraNam. AstArakaH. niparaNam. nipArakaH. nigaraNam. nigArakaH.
Most roots get compulsory vRddhi replacement before sic before flat -- either by this rule if they have ik, or by the next two rules if they are
Example. Here
In other words, the roots that end in
Where it not for this rule, atohalA would have made the lengthening optional.
KAZIKA rephalakArau yAvataH antau samIpau tadantasya aGgasya ata eva sthAne vRddhiH bhavati. kSara akSArIt. tsara atsArIt. jvala ajvAlIt. hmala ahmAlIt. ato halAder laghoH 7-2-7 iti vikalpasya ayam apavAdaH. ataH iti kim? nyakhorIt. nyamIlIt. lrAntasya iti kim? mA bhavAnaTIt. mA bhavAnazIt. antagrahaNaM kim? avabhrIt. azvallIt. atra yau rephalakArau aGgasya antau na tAvataH samIpau.
Examples with aniT roots --
Examples with seT roots --
This rule replaces the vowel of the root, so it still works when the root ends in two consonants --
KAZIKA vada-vrajoH halantAnAM ca aGgAnAm acaH sthAne vRddhir bhavati sici parasmaipade parataH. avAdIt. avrAjIt. vikalpa-bAdhanArthaM vadi-vraji-grahaNam. halantAnAm apAkSIt. abhaitsIt. acchaitsIt. arautsIt. atra yogavibhAge sati halantagrahaNam antareNa api sidhyati. katham? vadivrajyoH ityatra prathamayoge ataH iti sthAnI anuvartate, tato yatacaH iti sUtraM tatra aGgena ajvizeSyate, aGgasya acaH sici parataH vRddhir bhavati. tade tad dhal-grahaNam hal-samudAya-parigrahArtham. iha api syAt, arAGkSIt, abhAGkSIt. anyathA hi yena na avyavadhAnaM tena vyavahite 'pi vacanaprAmANyAd ity ekena varNena vyavadhAne syAt, anekena halA na syAt. udavoDhAm, udavoDham ityatra vaheH sici DhatvasalopAdInAm pUrvatrAsiddham ity asiddha-tvAt pUrvaM halanta-lakSaNA vRddhiH kriyate, pazcAd Dhalopanimittamotvam. tatra kRte punar vRddhir na bhavati, kRtatvAt. yatra tvakRtA vRddhiH, okArasya eva tatra bhavati, soDhAmitrasya apatyam sauDhAmitriH iti.
The previous rule won't work if the sic got iT, that is, won't work after halanta seT roots.
Therefore, before iSic, a hal-ender will not have its vowel replaced with vRddhi. But puganta will work if it can. Examples --
Back to is-aorist.
KAZIKA iD-Adau sici halantasyAGgasya vRddhir na bhavati. adevIt. asevIt. akoSIt. amoSIt. halantasya ityeva, alAvIt. nanu ca etad apy antaraGgatvAt guNAvAdezayoH kRtayoH halantaM bhavati? na etadevam. antaraGgam api guNam vacanArambha-sAmarthyAt sici vRddhir bAdhate ity uktam.
The vowel-enders get sicivRddhiH both before sic and before iSic --
As of 2023 I pasted
Example.
alternatively