chunk 50: 83005 Satvam and Natvam chunk 50: 83005 Satvam and Natvam→ 84040 stozz, STunA, doublings
83055 Replace non-wordfinal with curledback.
83056 Replace the
83057 after
83058 even if one of
83059 when a Sa-root or an affix is involved.
83060 of
83061
83065
83068 after
83072
83078 After
83079 Optionally before
83084
83095 After
83110
84001 After
84002 Even if
84003 After former in a tag , but not after
84011 nounbase-final,
84012 But compulsorily
84014
84037 replace wordfinal.
^ 
Headline, valid down to 84001 raSA, exclusive. The following rules all replace non wordfinal
For instance, a rule below, the kric rule, says --
But because of this headline, and of the most-alike rule, that kric rule means --
"replace
^ 
This rule can be roughly reworded into --
" When the
That happens when the
Otherwise this rule does not work, and the
If you find
The word
^ 
Nicknamed kric rule or Satvam rule. It means --
" Replace the non- wordfinal
Examples after
after
after ic --
See also Satvam.
^ 
Addition to kric rule.
Example with num in between --
See the kAzikA for more examples.
^ There is a big difference between Natvam and Satvam. The Natvam rules will work on everything, yet the Satvam rules will only work (A) when adding affixes, and (B) when Sa-roots come after preverbs. This is why words like
Examples with the Sa-root sad after a kric letter --
ni +
Example with
Example with
Counterexample. There is no change when the
See also exception zAsivasi right below.
^ Those three
Example with
With vas when vacisvapi replaces
And with ghas when gamahana erases the
ghas + liT jhi →
See the kAzikA for more examples.
^ 
Usually, Sa-roots when reduplicated will get kric after the stammer --
sic' + Nal 
This rule is an exception to that: if the Sa-root is before san, and the san gets kric, then the root itself won't get kric --
sic' +
This exception does not work if the san does not get kric --
sthA + san →
Or if the root is stu --
stu + san →
Or if the root has Ni at the end, like
Please see also about
^ 
...
As in --
The change will still happen when the aT from luGlaG comes in between --
An odd exception to this is
^ 
Examples --
As in --
( rule adyazvInA'vaSTabdhe uses this root to mean nearness in time )
^ Exception to AdezapratyayayoH, that would ordinarily prevent the change,
For instance, blood is not a living being, and here it is the doer of vi +
But if the doer is a living being, only
^
...
The
See optional exception vibhASeTaH right below.
^ 
Exception to iNaSSIdhva above. If the dhvam got iT, the
^ Only examples --
^ The only examples are the proper names --
and
go- + Gi +
These are aluk compounds.
^ Examples...
with
with
^ This change of
Example after
Example after
catur- + Am →
Example after
See also rule aTkupvAGnu.
^ In simpler words --
" rule raSA works even if letters that do not move the tip of the tongue down come in between. "
The letters that do move the tip of the tongue away from curledbackish position are
Example. Here we have Natvam even though
And here
The change will not happen if any of the "stopper" letters, namely
pari + AG +
^ Exception to raSA, that wants Natvam to work inside a word only.
Example.
And of course proper names and nicknames are tags too --
^ Example of nounbase-final
Example of num (from napuMsakasyajhal;acaH) --
Example of vibhakti (the sup-affix TA is a vibhakti, and here it changed into
^ The
So, as
^ Exception to the
pra +
Counterexample with
pari +
^ Exception to raSA.
So the
chunk 50: 83005 Satvam and Natvam