chunk 48: 83002 n to Ms82039 changes before serious, /niSThA to !n ←
chunk 48: 83002 n to Ms
83002 The next rules nasalize the previous optionally.
83004 But when not nasalizing, add
83006
83007
83010
83012 Replace
83013 Delete
83014 Delete
83015
83016 True r stays before
83017
83018 Wordfinal
83019
83022 Before
83023 Wordfinal
83024 Non-wordfinal
83025 Replace
83028
83029
83030 after
83031
83032
^ 
Talkaround, valid down to kAnAmreDi. The next rules replace wordfinals with ru. This rule clarifies that, if we so choose, the vowel before the ru becomes nasalized.
See also next rule.
This rule and the next affect --
83006 pumaH khayy am-pare
83007 naz chavy aprazAn
83010 nRRn pe
83012 kAn AmreDite
and some vedic rules too.
^ The previous rule says that we may choose to nasalize certain vowels. This adds that, if we choose to not nasalize them, we must add an M sound after them instead.
Example. Rule nazcha below turns
The rule above says that we may choose to replace
And this rule says that if we don't make the rule above work, then we must replace
Either way, the ru will become
Translating together this rule and the previous rule, we get the talkaround --
" When the next rules replace with ru, we have to either nasalize the vowel that is before the ru or add M after it. "
^ The
Here visarjanIyasya saH is compulsory -- kupvoKkaFpauca cannot change the
^ 
Examples --
The above translation is incomplete. See accurate translation of
^ 
The word
"when
Afterwards, other rules will turn the ru into
So if we don't apply this rule, we say --
and if we apply it --
all five with the same meaning.
^ As earlier, the ru will turn into
Only example --
^ 
This rule only works when
^ Example:
If the
^ This rule replaces all
Examples before
Example before pause --
Example before chav --
Example before zar --
In the last example, even though the
^ Exception to kharava.
Example. kharava will not work on
After the ru from
^ 
This rule has several effects --
(1) wordfinal
(2)
(3)
This rule is very annoying for beginners, because whenever we hear a wordfinal
and this
^ When saying a normal
In a lighter-effort
This rule says that when wordfinal
Together with the option "replace
(A)
(B)
(C)
In writing you will find (C) only, but both (A) and (C) are heard often.
Some people say that the word
The rule also works on the
Only the third option is found in print, but the others are heard sometimes.
^ In other words, the wordfinal
(we may also use the lighter-effort
^ About ninety-nine percent of the time, the effect of this rule is deleting the
This rule also deletes the
In detail --
^ Before vowel and pause, this rule does not work, so
Before yaN and zal, this rule replaces
Before the other consonants (the Jay), first this rule replaces
^ Example with
Examples with
If the serious is a zal, there is no anusvA --
An important side effect of this rule is that there is no
^ Exception to monus. Only example --
sam +
When the
^ 
Examples --
More examples in the kAzikA.
^ As in --
^ 
This is the same thing as saying --
"optionally
Example --
In the alternative --
^ Example --
Usually, when sandhi rules allow exceptions, only one of them is found in writing. In this case, however, all of
I always spell
See also rule zazchoTi, that manages
^ The Gam letters are
Examples with
Examples with
The
Examples with
82039 changes before serious, /niSThA to !n ←
chunk 48: 83002 n to Ms