chunk 21: 32134 habitual doer affixes, future time32084 time and tenses, zatR zAnac, anaDuh ←
chunk 21: 32134 habitual doer affixes, future time
32134 Down to
32135
32139
32168 Add
32177
32187
33003 The
33010 Add
33013
33014
33015
33018 to mean the action.
33088
33089
33090
33094
33102
33104 The
33107
33115
33126 Add
33128
33131 What means near present, is optionally like present.
33139 Use
33140 And for past ones too.
^ 
headline. The tacchIlAdi affixes (those explained in the next rules) make words that mean the habitual doer of the root.
Habitual doers are those that are used to, or have a duty to, or are good at, doing the action of the root.
So, if you killed a few dogs accidentally, nonprofessionally, and unskilfully, no one can grammatically call you a dogkiller by using han with the tacchIlAdi affix tRn. But they may still use tRc, which is not a tacchIlAdi.
Similarly, rule glA;ji " ksnu after
tRn
^ 
Example. With root kR "make", any maker is
These two differ only in the accent, which the former gets from citaH and the latter from JnityAdi. So someone that makes chairs professionally or as a hobby gets accent in the first vowel of
but if you jump to fame for having made just one chair, and not particularly skillfully, then the last vowel is accented --
^ 
The affix
The veda has also a rare
^ (This affix u' is not the same as the u added to uclass roots.)
After
After
After san, this u' makes adjectives that, by rule dhAtoHkarma, mean "that want to" or "that are going to" --
han + san + u' + jas → jighAMsa + u' + jas →
^ The
vi + 
The
The kAzikA lists examples of all eight rootnouns made by this rule, with su, au and jas added --
Notice that
^ 
Here JIt (from
Such roots, when kta is added, may mean either past time (by niSThA) --
or ongoing time (by this rule) --
^ The gamin-class are group 41 in the ashtadhyayidotcom
Such affixes usually mean the doer of the root, by kartarikRt, and usually mean what is happening. For instance, an
The word
^ This rule can be roughly reworded as --
"
Example with tumun --
Example with Nvul --
These words can be used to mean that the action "I bring" is the purpose of another action, as in --
In the last example, the nounbase
This rule can be used only when the purpose action and the other action have the same doer.
^ 
The trickle (means it will happen) comes from rule bhaviSyati.
Example --
^ Rule laTazza says that we can replace the laT of, say,
Example --
replacing the tip with zatR we get kR + zatR, and that adds up to
Another example --
Replacing ta with sat we get
In these examples
These forms where lRT became sat are found sometimes. Inria labels them with pfu, "participe futur", meaning future participle.
^ Example. The verb
is made from --
and has the same meaning as
The word
See also
See also splitting the
^ In other words, ading
Being Jit,
han + ghaJ + su →
Being ghit makes cajoHku work --
Action nouns can be formed by many other affixes, such as lyuT, or naG, or the a'' in
Notice that the action nouns are not the same thing as the abstract nouns mentioned at tasya bhAvas tva-talau. In that rule,
^ The Dvit are the roots that have label Du, such as
These roots can get
Examples --
vap + ktri →
These examples imply deliberate action. So
^ The Tu' at the start of a root is a label, by AdirJiTuDavaH. One such root is
^ This rule explains these six words (that would otherwise have gotten ghaJ) --
^ Some roots get ktin instead of ghaJ.
Examples --
^ sanAdyanta roots may get a kRt affix a'' added to mean the action.
Example.
pipAsa is a root and means "want to drink".
and
which is the same thing as saying "because they are thirsty"
Grammatical details.
pipAsa is a sanAdyanta root
Because of this rule, we may add a'' after pipAsa to get
Being feminine, it always gets Ap added (see ajAdyata) Ap, making
Examples with other sanAdyanta roots --
yuyutsa + a'' →
Even though san verbs such as
^ This
By ajAdy;ataSTAp, the aG'-enders always get Ap.
Example with a Sit root --
Examples with
^ This debars a''.
As + yuc →
^ This
^ su' ISad mean easily, dus means with difficulty. After these, the
as in
Works before preverbed roots too --
This rule is compulsory, so we may not use the usual Nyat yat etc, that would have made
^ 
Addition to ISad;dus;suSu.
After su' dus ISad that mean hardly or easily, the
su' + pA + khal
^ Example. When meaning "I just came" or "I'll leave straight away", you may use any present expression such as "I go" --
Incidentally, the kAzikA on trhis rule has a curious example sentence.
^ In other words, you may use the lRG for expressions like "if he knew he'd cry". Such a sentence may use lRG verbs both for "he knew" and for "he'd cry".
This rule is optional. And extremely so. In practice such hypotethical statements will almost always get liG, by hetuhetumator liG.
See formation of
See also bhUteca below.
^ We can also use lRG to talk about what could have happened in the past but did not happen.
Example. According to the previous rule, we may use lRG tenses of "know" and "cry" to mean "if he knew he'd cry". According to this rule, the same exact sentence might mean "if he had known he'd have cried".
32084 time and tenses, zatR zAnac, anaDuh ←
chunk 21: 32134 habitual doer affixes, future time