A kadArAd ekA saJjA, nadI, wee ←
14013 The stem of an affix is whatever it was added to originally, even if it grew afterwards.
14014
14015 Before
14017 What is before weak .
14018 But wimpy before
14019
14021 Use plural when meaning many.
14022 Dual, singular mean two, one.
14023 When meaning relationship with an action.
14024 Thingfromwhich is whatever one goes away from.
14025 Reason for fear, of roots meaning fear protection.
14026 Whatever one is fed up with, of
14032 Aim is what doer wants to connect with object
14033 With verbs that mean "to like", the pleased one .
14034 With
14042 Tool is what just helps.
14045 Location is the place .
14049 object is what the doer wants most.
14050 What is related to the verb in the same way too, even if unwanted.
14051 Some roots may take an extra object optionally.
14054 Doer is who acts on its own.
Simple example.
Rule GyApprA says "add su to
Complicated example.
So at the stage
Now some rule changes jas into zi.
Now we have
Now some rule adds num to
In
And now thanks to the fact that
Simple examples --
Harder examples --
Here, adding that sip affix made
The
and so is the
See also --
The nounbase that is before a valAdi weak is a word, in addition to being a nounbase.
This means that nounbases before valAdi weaks behave as if they were words as far as sandhi rules are concerned.
Example. When we join together
Because this
Had the
Exception to svAdiSva. The nounbase that is before a weak that starts with
Example:
TA is always weak, and does not start with a val (it starts with
Therefore, whatever nounbase we add TA to, is a wimpy nounbase.
And that nounbase is not a word.
As in --
Therefore a nounbase, after we add to it a sup or a taddhita, can be in one of three situations --
(A) it can be before a strong
(B) it can be a word, if either its sup was deleted, or it is before a valAdi weak
(C) otherwise it will be wimpy, that is, before a
In that table, the ones that have "rAjñ" are the ones that had a wimpy
Remembering this general rule is far easier than memorizing the whole list of 21 words in the table.
Exception to svAdiSva. The matvartha affixes are those that mean "that has". Of those, matup vatup and
In the following examples, the lack of wordness of
and here hazica did not work --
As in --
" many", in grammar, means "three or more". So we can't use a plural to mean two.
Examples. In these sentences, the nounbase
And the verbs here got the plural endings jhi, jha because they mean the doer and there are many doers --
And these other verbs here got the plural endings jha mahi because they mean the object and there are many objects --
and these six verb endings --
So, we must use a dual ending when two things are meant --
and singular ending when meaning one thing --
"wiped his eyes with his hands and said this to
headline. The following rules only work on words related to an action.
Example.
One of the rules below explains " location means place".
Now, if this had been said in any other part of the grammar, we would say that a forest is a location, because a forest is a place. But, actually, this rule
" location means place"
is short for
"the location of an action is the word that describes the place where the action happens".
So, in the sentence
However, in the sentence
The words that have this sort of relationships with actions are called
doer -- who does the action
object -- what gets done
tool -- what helps to do the action, and is not one of the above
aim -- what the action is aimed at, who is benefitted or harmed by it, or the purpose of the action
thingfromwhich -- the starting point of movement or the cause of the action
location -- the place where the action happens
The thingfromwhich role shows the point AWAY FROM WHICH an action of moving happens --
The word that means the action does not need to be in the sentence if it is obvious --
In the above examples,
Besides physical places that things come from, the thingfromwhich role can also mean the cause, reason, motive --
and sometimes means the thing one would like to get away from (for examples, see bhItrArthA and parAjera right below).
As for instance, the word
are thingfromwhich of their verbs by this rule, and that's why they got fifth from apAdAnepaJcamI.
As in --
Here
When
Examples. Here
because
And here the king (doer of
Here the aim words
See also --
what means purpose or result is an aim
with verbs that mean to like the pleased one is the aim
with
And the thing liked is the doer. As in --
Here
Exception. With
Therefore the person gets fourth. As in --
This rule explains what the " tool" role is. The tool of an action is what helps to do the action but is not the doer, object, etc. Example. In --
the action is
or part of the doer --
The last three sentences have the same meaning, but the verb agrees with the doer only, and ignores the accompanier.
Example. In --
the word
Yet, in --
even though the forest is a place, the word
The Sanskrit term for location is
Example 1. In the sentence
the cookie is the object, because Polly wants it.
Example 2. In the sentence
the cookie is still the object, because Polly still wants it.
Now please see next rule, tathAyukta.
The previous rule teaches that if Polly wants a cookie, the cookie is the object.
This rule says that whatever word is related to whatever root in the same way, is also the object, even if no wanting is involved. So here too
and here the bone is an object too --
Explained in another way: when we use roots like find, hate, see, drink, etc then whatever is found, hated, seen, drunk, etc is the object. As long as it works in grammar in the exact same way as a wanted cookie, it's an object.
One such special roots is
because
with the exact same meaning. Here,
Not many roots can take such extra objects. The most common are
An example with zAs --
which means the same thing as --
Example 1.
In the sentence --
the word
Example 2.
In --
the word
A kadArAd ekA saJjA, nadI, wee ←