jAgro '-vi;ciN;Nal;Gitsu

जाग्रो ऽॱविॱचिण्णल्ङित्सु ONPANINI 73085

replace /jAgR (with /guNa) before all affixes except vi वि /ciN /Nal and the /Git.

Exception to < sArvadhAtuk... and to all rules that cause /vRddhi or no-/guNa no-/vRddhi.

Example. Rule acoJNiti ordinarily causes /vRddhi before /Nvul /Nic /ghaJ..., but this rule overrides it —

jAgR जागृ + /Nvul → !**jAgaraka- जागरकॱ "wakeupper" (one that wakes up)

jAgR जागृ + /Nic + /tip → !**jAgarayati जागरयति "makes (him) wake up"

Also, rule kGitica ordinarily prohibits /guNa before /kit affixes like /kta /ktavatu /ktvA. But this rule overrides kGitica —

jAgR जागृ + /kta → !**jAgarita- जागरितॱ "woken up"

Why do we say not before vi वि /ciN /Nal /Git?

Before vi वि affixes like /kvin, the ordinary rules apply.

So /kvin prevents /guNa like all /kit do —

jAgR जागृ + vin विन् + /su → !**jAgRvis जागृविस्

and /ciN and /Nal cause /vRddhi as usual —

jAgR जागृ + /ciN → !**ajAgAri अजागारि, like **akAri अकारि

jAgR जागृ + /Nal → **jajAgAra जजागार by ata::upadh..., like **cakAra चकार

and /Git affixes like /tas and /thas, which are /Git by sArvadhAtuk..., activate kGitica as usual —

jAgR जागृ + /laT /tas → !**jAgRtas जागृतस्

jAgR जागृ + /laT /thas → !**jAgRthas जागृथस्

and the flat hard liG affixes do the same, as they are /Git by yAsuTparasm... —

jAgR जागृ + hard liG /tip → jAgR जागृ + **yAt यात् → !**jAgRyAt जागृयात् "he would wake up"

Why did you say hard liG? Doesn't yAsuTparasm... /Gitify both hard and soft /liG?

No. The soft liG ain't /Git, because of the exception kidAziSi —

jAgR जागृ + soft liG /tip → jAgR जागृ + **yAt' यात्ऽ → !**jAgaryAt जागर्यात् "may he wake up", by this rule

73085 jAgro '-vi;ciN;Nal;G...