overview of flat and bent
rules that should be studied first
choose-
change-
choose-
change-
wordfinal
Different kinds of nothing.
According to the grammar rules, there are flatty roots like
and bendy roots like
and flattybendy roots like
and there are a lot of grammar rules that explain which roots are flatty, which are bendy, and which are flattybendy.
Please be warned that lots of authors in the last three thousand years have either never heard of those rules, or unapologetically ignored them. So, don't panic when you find a
Here the
(rulesthatshouldbestudi) (rulesthfi)
...
If you buy any book that promises to teach you Esperanto, Ancient Greek, or Tagalog, chances are that's a tutorial: you are expected to learn the first lesson first, then you do the exercises, and then you'll know enough to go ahead to the second lesson. And so on.
The
Why?
Because it has never been a book for people that want to learn Sanskrit. It is not a tutorial, but a bunch of notes for teachers. Or a collection of lesson names. No one has ever learnt anything from reading a rule and then trying to figure out alone what it means. The basic assumption of the grammar maker is not that you will read the book from lesson one to lesson 32. Rather, the grammar maker assumes that your teacher will tell you about a rule when it is necessary for you to know about it, and then will explain its meaning.
So going into
Asume you know enough about Sanskrit to be able to explore a bit of the coal mine sometimes. What rules should be looked at first?
The sandhi rules are used all the time. You should first do some tutorial about sandhi, then after you are used to the most common instances, looking at the way pANini stated the rules might be interesting. Or not.
Next come the rules about adding sup affixes and feminine affixes to nounbases. These too are used all the time.
And then the rules about making verbs, such as kartarizap.
Intro to these groups --
change-
change-
Rule lasya says that every tense affix, after we add it after a root, must be replaced with one of the eighteen tiG affixes. How do we know which affix to choose? There are many rules teaching which one.
The most important rule is laHkarmaNi. This says, among other things, that we may choose an affix that has the same number and person as the doer of the root. For instance, if we want to say that the hens cross, or crossed, or will cross the road, then the doer of the root
(We know that we must use a plural affix because rule bahuSubahu teaches so, and we need a third person affix because rule zeSeprathamaH says so.)
Now, rule tiGastrINi teaches that six of the tiG affixes are third person, namely tiptasjhi and tAtAJjha.
Then, rule tAnyeka tells us that the third affix of each group of three is plural. So only the affixes jhi and jha are third person and plural.
Of those two, jhi is flat and jha is bent. We will use jhi unless some rule says that we must or may use the bent.
So the verb we need will be made by replacing any tense with jhi. For instance, to mean present time, we add laT to the root, then replace laT with jhi --
To express past time, we may use laG or other tenses. when we add laG and replace it with jhi we get --
(wordfinalsandhirules) (wordf)
... very lame, needs total rewrite
The wordfinal
Let me show some examples of the effects of these rules.
(A) when a word ends in
(B) when a word ends in
(C) when a word ends in
There are one or two hundred such rules. Please DO NOT PANIC. You do not have to study them or memorize them before you get used to do what they say. And you don't have to do that afterwards either.
QRAQRAQRA
...
QRA QRA QRA
(differentkindsofnothin) (differeth)
The
There are different kinds of nothing --
(1) Replacing something with lopa deletes one letter. When rule saMyogAnta commands "replace
(2) luk is a more destructive sort of nothing. When SaDbhyoluk teaches "replace zas with luk", that turns the whole zas into nothingness. So
Not only that. If adding an affix made changes to its stem, replacing that affix with luk will roll back those changes.
(3) replacing an affix with lup has the same effects that luk has, and it also rolls back the changes that the original affix made to the gender and number of its stem.
(4) zlu is a sort of nothing that, when added after a root, makes the root reduplicate (see zlau).